Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Brief Report: Doubly Robust Estimation of Standardized Risk Difference and Ratio in the Exposed Population
Tomohiro Shinozaki1, Yutaka Matsuyama
1From the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
Standardization-a method used to adjust for confounding-estimates counterfactual risks in a target population. To adjust for confounding variables that contain too many combinations to be fully stratified, two model-based standardization methods exist: regression standardization and use of an inverse probability of exposure weighted-reweighted estimators. Whereas the former requires an outcome regression model conditional on exposure and confounders, the latter requires a propensity score model. In reconciling among their modeling assumptions, doubly robust estimators, which only require correct specification of either the outcome regression or the propensity score model but do not necessitate both, have been well studied for total populations. Here, we provide doubly robust estimators of standardized risk difference and ratio in the exposed population. Theoretical details, simple model extension for independently censored outcomes, and a SAS program are provided in the eAppendix (http://links.lww.com/EDE/A955).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Odds Ratio
Relative Risk
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Margin of Error

