Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction After Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Marion Boulanger1, Lucie Camelière1, Rui Felgueiras1
1From the Service de Neurologie (M.B., E.T.), and Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire (L.C., L.B.), CHU Côte de Nacre, Université de Caen Basse Normandie, Caen, France; Neurology Department, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal (R.F.); Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute for Health Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand (K.R.); Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (P.M.R.); and INSERM UMR U919, Caen, France (E.T.).
Insights
The risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is similar. Risk factors for MI also largely overlap between CEA and CAS, with a notable exception in the effect of sex.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Interventional cardiology
- Vascular surgery
Background:
- Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) carries a higher risk of stroke and death than carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- Randomized trials suggest a higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after CEA compared to CAS, but numbers were small and risk factors remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the risk of MI after CAS and CEA.
- To identify and compare risk factors for MI in patients undergoing CAS versus CEA.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from January 1980 to June 2014, including unpublished data.
- Extracted data on 9 predefined risk factors and analyzed absolute and relative risks of MI.
- Identified differential effects of risk factors on MI between CAS and CEA.
Main Results:
- The 30-day absolute risk of MI was 0.87% after CEA and 0.70% after CAS (P=0.38).
- Symptomatic stenosis, restenosis, and male sex were associated with higher MI risk after CAS.
- Age, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and restenosis increased MI risk after CEA.
- Men had a lower risk of MI after CAS compared to women, a difference not observed after CEA (P=0.01).
Conclusions:
- The overall risk of MI is not significantly different between CAS and CEA.
- Risk factors for MI are generally similar for both procedures.
- Men exhibit a lower risk of MI following CAS but not CEA.
Background And Purpose:
Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is associated with higher risk of periprocedural stroke and death when compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). By contrast, the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) was higher after CEA than after CAS in randomized trials. However, numbers were small, and risk factors are unknown.
Methods:
We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies published from January 1980 to June 2014 and collected unpublished data. We extracted data on 9 predefined risk factors (age, contralateral carotid occlusion, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, sex, hypertension, peripheral artery disease, type stenosis, and clinical presentation). We selected studies with data available on MI in at least 1 subgroup, calculated absolute and relative risks, and identified differential effects on risks of MI.
Results:
The 30-day absolute risk of MI was 0.87% (95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.07) after CEA and 0.70% (95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.88) after CAS (Pint=0.38). After CAS, patients with symptomatic stenosis and restenosis were at higher risk of MI, whereas men were at lower risk. After CEA, age, history of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and restenosis increased the risk of MI. Only the effect of sex differed between CAS and CEA with men being at lower risk of MI than women after CAS, whereas there was no difference between after CEA (Pint=0.01).
Conclusions:
The risk of MI after CEA and CAS did not significantly differ. Risk factors for MI are overall similar in both techniques except that men are at lower risk of MI after CAS but not after CEA.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
