Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for k_a Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Practice variation and limited adoption of evidence in POPF prevention after pancreatoduodenectomy: an international E-AHPBA-endorsed survey.

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association·2026

Same author

Dorsal spinal instrumentation in multiple myeloma: postoperative acute kidney injury is associated with mortality, morbidity, and deterioration of bone and muscle status.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026

Same author

Adaptation of emergency surgical care during successive COVID-19 waves: a single-center analysis of surgically treated acute appendicitis.

BMC surgery·2026

Same author

Postoperative muscle loss and preoperative sarcopenia predict survival and morbidity after surgical stabilization for spinal metastases: a longitudinal CT-morphometric analysis of 285 patients.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026

Same author

Emergency laparotomies in trauma management: a six-year case series.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2026

Same author

[Periprosthetic fractures after elbow arthroplasty].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring

Published on: December 14, 2020

Prospective evaluation of the Eppendorf-Cologne Scale.

Michael Hoffmann¹, Wolfgang Lehmann, Malte Schroeder

¹aDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg bCologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.

European Journal of Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine

|August 20, 2015

Summary

The Eppendorf-Cologne Scale (ECS) offers superior prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes compared to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). This scale better identifies mortality risk, especially within the critical GCS 3 patient group.

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays

Published on: February 21, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring

Published on: December 14, 2020

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays

Stepwise Dosing Protocol for Increased Throughput in Label-Free Impedance-Based GPCR Assays

Published on: February 21, 2020

Area of Science:

Neurotrauma
Clinical Outcome Prediction
Trauma Registry Analysis

Background:

Early diagnosis and outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury (TBI) are crucial for effective treatment and resource allocation.
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a standard tool, but its predictive accuracy for TBI outcomes requires continuous evaluation.
The Eppendorf-Cologne Scale (ECS) has been proposed as an alternative or adjunct for TBI assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To re-evaluate the Eppendorf-Cologne Scale (ECS).
To compare the predictive accuracy of the ECS against the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for patient outcomes.
To assess the utility of the ECS in differentiating outcomes within the GCS 3 patient cohort.

Main Methods:

Prospective cohort analysis of severely injured trauma patients from the German Society for Trauma Surgery Trauma Registry (2012-2013).
Inclusion criteria: directly admitted, alive on admission, complete GCS, ECS, and outcome data (survival to discharge or death).
Predictive accuracy was modeled using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis.

Main Results:

17,616 patients met the inclusion criteria.
The ECS demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for outcome compared to the GCS (AUROC 0.853 vs. 0.836, P=0.062).
An ECS score of 8 was associated with significantly higher mortality (25-fold vs. ECS 0; 1.5-fold vs. GCS 3).

Conclusions:

The ECS exhibits higher accuracy in predicting patient outcomes following traumatic brain injury than the GCS.
The ECS provides enhanced differentiation of outcomes, particularly within the critical GCS 3 patient group.
These findings support the use of the ECS for improved prognostic assessment in TBI.