Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of CP-violating asymmetries in B0 decays to CP eigenstates.

Physical review letters·2001
Same author

The placebo enigma in antidepressant clinical trials.

Journal of clinical psychopharmacology·2001
Same author

Defective stimulus-secretion coupling in islets of Psammomys obesus, an animal model for type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes·2001
Same author

Hyperglycemia contributes to impaired insulin response in GK rat islets.

Diabetes·2001
Same author

O2 dependence of K+ transport in sickle cells: the effect of different cell populations and the substituted benzaldehyde 12C79.

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology·2001
Same author

Weight gain with risperidone among patients with mental retardation: effect of calorie restriction.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.9K

The accuracy of the Edinburgh visual loss diagnostic algorithm.

C Goudie1, A Khan1, C Lowe2

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Eye (London, England)
|August 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary

The Edinburgh visual loss algorithm significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for inexperienced clinicians, rising from 51% to 84%. This tool enhances referrals to eye services, regardless of user experience.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

14.7K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.9K
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

14.7K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Clinical Algorithms

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis of visual loss is crucial for effective treatment and patient outcomes.
  • Inexperienced clinicians often face challenges in diagnosing complex visual conditions.
  • Standardized diagnostic tools can aid in improving accuracy and consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Visual Loss Algorithm.
  • To compare algorithm-assisted diagnoses with gold-standard diagnoses by experienced ophthalmologists.
  • To assess the algorithm's impact on diagnostic accuracy for clinicians with varying experience levels.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study involving patients referred with visual loss to the Edinburgh Eye Pavilion.
  • Visual loss assessment using the Edinburgh Visual Loss Algorithm by medical students, trainees, or optometrists.
  • Comparison of algorithm-assisted diagnoses against a gold-standard diagnosis and pre-algorithm referral accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Pre-algorithm referral accuracy for visual loss was 51%.
  • Algorithm-assisted diagnosis achieved an overall accuracy of 84%.
  • High diagnostic accuracy was observed across various conditions including macula (86%), media opacity (89%), and post chiasmal lesions (100%). Accuracy was consistent among different users.

Conclusions:

  • The Edinburgh Visual Loss Algorithm significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy for clinicians, particularly those inexperienced in ophthalmology.
  • The algorithm improves the accuracy of referrals to hospital eye services.
  • The tool shows potential as an effective learning aid for junior clinicians.