Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Two-piece zirconia oral implants withstand masticatory loads: An investigation in the artificial mouth
Benedikt Christopher Spies1, Julian Nold1, Kirstin Vach2
1Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Center for Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Freiburg, Germany.
Objective:
To evaluate the fracture resistance of two-piece zirconia oral implants after long-term thermomechanical cycling in an aqueous environment. Non-loaded samples and a one-piece implant system served as control groups.
Methods:
A total of 48 zirconia implants were evaluated: 16 one-piece implants (ATZ; Group A) and 32 differently connected two-piece implants (16 screwed, Group B; 16 bonded, Group C) made of Y-TZP-A (implant+abutment; B) and Y-TZP-A/ATZ (implant/abutment; C), respectively. These groups were divided into two subgroups composed of 8 samples. The samples of subgroups 1 (A1, B1, C1) were not exposed to any cyclic loading, whereas subgroups 2 (A2, B2, C2) were loaded with 10 million cycles (98 N). Subsequently, all 48 implants were statically loaded to fracture.
Results:
A constant load on distinct lever arms resulted in different exerted bending moments during the dynamic loading (A2: 23.4Ncm, B2: 17.9 Ncm, C2: 32.3 Ncm). All implants survived the long-term thermomechanical cycling. For the static loading the following average bending moments were calculated: A1/A2: 362/399 Ncm; B1/B2: 398/346 Ncm; C1/C2: 380/252 Ncm. Foregoing dynamic loading significantly increased fracture resistance of Group A implants, whereas Group B/C implants showed significantly decreased values. Potentially owed to the experimental setup in an aqueous environment of 60 °C, 5/8 C2 samples showed mobility between implant and abutment due to debonding after dynamic loading conditions.
Significance:
The evaluated ceramic implant systems seem to be able to resist physiological chewing forces long-term. Within the limitations of the experimental setup, the connecting mechanism of Group C implants might be a weak point.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Oral Cavity
Teeth: The teeth are the hardest structures in our bodies. Humans have two sets of teeth throughout their lifetime: deciduous (baby) teeth and permanent teeth. Each tooth consists of several parts: the crown (visible part), the root (embedded in the jaw), enamel (hard outer...
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.