Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

269
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
269
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

1.5K
The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...
1.5K
Storage01:23

Storage

489
A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze...
489
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

606
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
606
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

582
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
582

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making new connections: An fNIRS machine learning classification study of inter-brain synchrony in the default mode network.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Interactive Alignment After Communication Partner Training in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2026
Same author

Coding and Validation for Breadth and Desirability of 1,214 English Adjectives.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Cross-recurrence quantification analysis captures inter-brain coupling during naturalistic negotiation: a new dynamic approach for hyperscanning.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Contextual assembly of lexical functions in large language models.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Reconsidering intrapersonal communication through an interdisciplinary lens.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same journal

The STEARC effect revisited: does time shape spatial attention and memory?

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS).

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

More caution or more lenient: deciphering the role of negative affect in recognition and inference.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Cognitive offloading, critical thinking and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT: a comparative study of artificial intelligence-assisted and manual task performance in young adults.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Emojis vs. black-and-white and colored drawings: comparing living and non-living things in oral naming.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

The impact of facial expressions on space- and object-based attention by gaze cues.

Cognitive processing·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.5K

Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging.

Janelle Szary1, Rick Dale2, Christopher T Kello2

  • 1Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA. jszary@ucmerced.edu.

Cognitive Processing
|August 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cognitive systems exhibit power law dynamics when driven by interdependent interactions. Collaboration shifts memory search behavior from power law to lognormal distributions, potentially limiting flexibility.

Keywords:
Collaborative memoryCollaborative recallInteraction dominanceLévy processesMemory foragingMulti-model inferencePower laws

More Related Videos

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.6K
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
09:01

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Published on: July 8, 2015

13.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.5K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.6K
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
09:01

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Published on: July 8, 2015

13.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Dynamics
  • Memory Processes

Background:

  • Power law distributions in cognitive systems indicate multiplicative, interdependent interactions.
  • Understanding memory search dynamics is crucial for cognitive modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate memory search dynamics in individual versus collaborative participants.
  • Determine how collaboration influences behavioral patterns and distribution fits.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of recall tasks between individual, collaborative, and nominal groups.
  • Multi-model inference to fit temporal recall distributions with five candidate models (normal, exponential, gamma, lognormal, Pareto).

Main Results:

  • Both individual and collaborative memory search fit interaction-dominant distributions (lognormal and Pareto).
  • Individual behavior showed a stronger power law fit, while collaborative behavior favored a lognormal distribution.
  • Collaborative dyads exhibited collaborative inhibition but generated distinct search patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Behavioral dynamics shift from power law to lognormal under task constraints, such as collaboration.
  • This shift may indicate reduced flexibility in search strategies (perseverative vs. explorative).
  • Future research should explore factors influencing the power law to lognormal behavioral shift in collaborative memory.