Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND INTAKE COMPARISONS IN CHILEAN CHILDREN 4-5 YEARS ATTENDING DAY-CARE CENTRES
Gabriela Salazar1, Fabián Vásquez1, Maria P Rodríguez1
1Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago (Chile).. gsalazar@inta.uchile.cl.
Insights
The doubly labeled water (DLW) method accurately measures energy expenditure in preschoolers. Energy intake assessment errors, not DLW method flaws, likely explain minor discrepancies in preschool children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition Science
- Human Physiology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- The doubly labeled water (DLW) method offers high accuracy (1%) and precision (5-8%) for energy expenditure assessment.
- Energy intake assessment methods are prone to significant errors, ranging from 15-20%.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify DLW methodology errors in 4-5 year olds.
- To evaluate how these errors impact comparisons with energy intake measurements.
Main Methods:
- Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured using DLW over 14 days in 18 preschool children.
- Energy intake was assessed via food weighing and 24-hour recalls.
- Assumptions influencing DLW error, such as background variability and food quotient, were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Mean energy expenditure was 1373 ± 177 kcal/day, and mean energy intake was 1409 ± 161 kcal/day.
- The overall difference between intake and expenditure was minimal (42.9 kcal/day).
- DLW measurement error accounted for only 2.4% of the difference between intake and expenditure.
Conclusions:
- Energy expenditure in preschool children aligns with existing research.
- Small differences between energy intake and expenditure are likely due to intake assessment methods and diet homogeneity.
- The DLW method demonstrates low error, supporting its reliability in this age group.
Introduction:
the doubly labelled water (DLW) method has an accuracy of 1% and within-subject precision of 5-8%, depending on subject's age and environments issues. Energy intake assessment is prone to errors (>15- 20%) depending in the method utilized.
Objective:
to quantify DLW methodology errors in four to five year olds that could affect the comparison with energy intake.
Methods:
energy expenditure (TEE, by DLW), was assessed during 14 days in 18 preschool children, who attended eight hours daily to day-care centres. Energy intake was determined by a combined method: food weighing during weekdays and recall after leaving the Centre (17h to sleep time) plus 24 h recall, during the weekend. Several assumptions affecting DLW total error were assessed to determine their influence in the comparison to energy intake (i.e. background variability, space ratio, proportion of water subject to fractionation, food quotient value).
Results:
the individual mean energy expenditure was 1 373 ± 177 kcal and the energy intake (1 409 ± 161 kcal). The overall difference between intake and expenditure was 42.9 kcal/day (limits of agreement + 259.1 to -112.3 kcal/day). TEE measurement error only explained a minor quantity (2.4%), between both measurements, and the observed mean isotope dilution space was 1.030 ± 0.010 confirming the value utilized in adults studies.
Conclusions:
energy expenditure data is similar to other studies in preschool children. The small difference found between energy intake and expenditure may be attributed to the applied energy intake methodology, the homogeneous diet at care centres during the week-days and the lower DLW methodology error.
More Related Videos
06:57Determining Basal Energy Expenditure and the Capacity of Thermogenic Adipocytes to Expend Energy in Obese Mice
Published on: November 11, 2021
04:54Using a Combination of Indirect Calorimetry, Infrared Thermography, and Blood Glucose Levels to Measure Brown Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis in Humans
Published on: June 2, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Metabolic Rate
The Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) measures the energy expended at rest.
Several factors influence...
Energy Budgets
Energy Balance
Production Efficiency
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns