Compound A Inhibits Bladder Cancer Growth Predominantly via Glucocorticoid Receptor Transrepression
Yichun Zheng1, Hitoshi Ishiguro1, Hiroki Ide1
1Department of Urology (Y.Z.), Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China; Departments of Pathology and Urology (Y.Z., H.Is., H.Id., S.I., E.K., T.K., M.J., L.O.R., H.M.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Y.Z., H.Is., T.K., H.M.), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642; and Photocatalyst Group (H.Is.), Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology, Kawasaki 210-0821, Japan.
Abstract:
Recent evidence indicates that glucocorticoids (GCs) suppress bladder cancer cell invasion through the GC receptor (GR) pathway, whereas androgen-mediated androgen receptor (AR) signals induce bladder tumor progression. In this study, we assessed the effects of 2-(4-acetoxyphenyl)-2-chloro-N-methyl-ethylammonium chloride (compound A [CpdA]), which was shown to function as not only a GR modulator but also an AR antagonist, on the growth of bladder cancer. In GR/AR-positive cells, CpdA strongly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation as well as increased G1 phase-arrested cell population and apoptosis. Specifically, CpdA at 1μM decreased cell viability of TCCSUP/UMUC3-control-short hairpin RNA (shRNA), TCCSUP/UMUC3-GR-shRNA, and TCCSUP/UMUC3-AR-shRNA by 50%/67%, 25%/26%, and 38%/58%, respectively. CpdA also inhibited cell migration and invasion of GR/AR-positive (up to 61% decrease) and GR-positive/AR-silencing (up to 51% decrease) lines and, less strongly, those of GR-silencing/AR-positive lines (up to 35% decrease). Additionally, in UMUC3-control xenograft-bearing male mice, CpdA more strongly suppressed tumor growth than dexamethasone or hydroxyflutamide. In reporter gene assays, CpdA failed to induce GR transactivation, whereas it antagonized dihydrotestosterone-enhanced AR transactivation. In contrast, CpdA reduced nuclear factor (NF)-κB and activator protein 1 transcriptional activities, indicating induction of GR-mediated transrepression. Correspondingly, the expression of NF-κB-related molecules, matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, interleukin-6, and vascular endothelial growth factor, was significantly down-regulated by CpdA in control lines but not in GR-silencing cells. Moreover, coimmunoprecipitation showed that CpdA promoted the interactions between GR and NF-κB. Thus, CpdA likely inhibits bladder cancer growth predominantly via inducing GR transrepression and at least partially mediated through the AR pathway, suggesting its effects more beneficial than GCs/pure GR ligands or AR antagonists.
Insights
Compound A (CpdA) inhibits bladder cancer growth by suppressing cell invasion and proliferation. This novel therapeutic agent acts through glucocorticoid receptor (GR) transrepression and androgen receptor (AR) antagonism, offering potential benefits over existing treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Endocrinology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Glucocorticoids (GCs) suppress bladder cancer invasion via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) pathway.
- Androgen receptor (AR) signaling promotes bladder tumor progression.
- There is a need for novel therapeutic agents targeting bladder cancer growth.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effects of compound A (CpdA), a GR modulator and AR antagonist, on bladder cancer growth.
- To elucidate the mechanisms underlying CpdA's anti-cancer effects.
Main Methods:
- Cell viability, proliferation, colony formation, cell cycle, apoptosis, migration, and invasion assays were performed on bladder cancer cell lines.
- In vivo tumor growth was assessed in xenograft mouse models.
- Reporter gene assays, co-immunoprecipitation, and Western blotting were used to investigate molecular mechanisms.
Main Results:
- CpdA significantly inhibited bladder cancer cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, and invasion in GR/AR-positive cells.
- CpdA treatment led to G1 phase arrest and increased apoptosis.
- In vivo, CpdA suppressed tumor growth more effectively than dexamethasone or hydroxyflutamide, and its mechanism involves GR transrepression and AR antagonism.
Conclusions:
- CpdA inhibits bladder cancer growth primarily through GR transrepression and partially through AR antagonism.
- CpdA demonstrates superior anti-tumor effects compared to GCs or pure AR antagonists.
- CpdA represents a promising therapeutic candidate for bladder cancer treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Abnormal Proliferation
GPCR Desensitization


