Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

58.8K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
58.8K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

275.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
275.3K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

71.9K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
71.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

67.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.2K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

67.8K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
67.8K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

62.2K
Overview
62.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wound Management Practices in Scrotal-Confined Fournier's Gangrene.

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP·2025
Same author

Plasma urotensin-2 levels as a potential biomarker in prostate cancer: Analysis across disease stages.

Medicine·2025
Same author

Head-to-head comparison of GA-68 PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI findings with postoperative results in preoperative locoregional staging and localization of prostate cancer.

The Prostate·2024
Same author

The role of tissue persistent organic pollutants and genetic polymorphisms in patients with benign and malignant kidney tumors.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2024
Same author

Comparison of Testicular Sonography and Elastography Findings With Semen Parameters in Cases Investigated for Infertility.

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine·2024
Same author

Comparison of Tumor Enucleation and Standard Partial Nephrectomy According to Trifecta Outcomes: A Multicenter Study by the Turkish Academy of Urology, Uro-Oncology Working Group.

Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

18.5K

How to respond to referee comments for scientific articles?

Mustafa Serdar Kalemci1, Burak Turna1

  • 1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Turkish Journal of Urology
|September 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Responding to scientific journal referee comments is crucial for publication success. This review guides researchers on effectively addressing reviewer feedback to improve manuscript acceptance in high-impact journals.

Keywords:
Articlepeer reviewresponse letterscientific referee

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

18.5K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Manuscript Preparation
  • Peer Review Process

Background:

  • Increasing article submissions necessitate greater editorial selectivity.
  • The peer review mechanism is frequently employed by scientific journals.
  • Publishing in high-impact journals presents significant challenges for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance for researchers on responding to referee comments.
  • To address the lack of literature detailing effective responses to peer review.
  • To facilitate the scientific article publication process.

Main Methods:

  • This is a review article.
  • It synthesizes existing knowledge and best practices.
  • Focuses on strategies for responding to reviewer critiques.

Main Results:

  • Effective response to referee comments is a critical step in publication.
  • Clear and constructive engagement with reviewers enhances manuscript quality.
  • Understanding the peer review process aids in successful revision.

Conclusions:

  • Authors need clear strategies for responding to peer review.
  • This review offers practical advice for navigating the revision process.
  • Improving responses to referee comments can increase publication rates in prestigious journals.