Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

05:53
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
10.8K
Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy
J-M Bouvet1, G Makouanzi2, D Cros1
1CIRAD, Genetic Improvement and Adaptation of Mediterranean and Tropical Plants (AGAP) Research Unit, Montpellier, France.
Heredity
|September 3, 2015
Summary
Accurate variance component estimation in plant breeding is key for genetic gain. Progeny models utilizing genome-wide data offer superior prediction accuracy for genomic selection compared to parent-based models.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative genetics
- Plant breeding
- Genomic selection
Background:
- Hybrids are vital in plant breeding, necessitating precise variance component estimation for optimizing genetic gain.
- Genome-wide information can enhance models for assessing additive and non-additive genetic variances and their prediction accuracy in genomic selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and compare linear mixed models using pedigree and marker-based relationships for estimating genetic effects (additive, dominance, epistatic).
- To evaluate the prediction accuracy of these models for genomic selection in Eucalyptus.
- To assess the performance of progeny models incorporating gametic phase information.
Main Methods:
- Ten linear mixed models were developed using parent-based pedigree and marker-based relationship matrices.
- Five progeny models utilizing gametic phase information were created to estimate additive (A), dominance (D), and epistatic (AA, AD, DD) effects.
- Models were compared using Eucalyptus tree height data, 3303 SNP markers, and metrics like AIC, variance ratios, goodness-of-fit, prediction accuracy, and MSE.
Main Results:
- Parent marker-based models outperformed pedigree-based models, showing better fit, accuracy, and lower AIC and MSE.
- Progeny gametic phase-based models demonstrated superior performance in fitting observations and predicting genetic values.
- Estimates for additive-by-dominance (AD) and dominance-by-dominance (DD) variances had high standard errors, and null estimates were found for AA and AD effects in progeny models.
Conclusions:
- Genome-wide information significantly improves the accuracy of variance component estimation and prediction in plant breeding.
- Progeny models incorporating gametic phase information are advantageous for predicting genetic values in hybrid breeding.
- Further research is needed to refine the estimation of complex epistatic effects.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Allele Traits
38.8K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.8K
Multiple Allele Traits
15.0K
15.0K
Hybrid Zones
22.5K
Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.
22.5K
What is Population Genetics?
65.9K
A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
65.9K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
77.5K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.5K
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
16.7K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
16.7K

