Systemic antibiotics for treating diabetic foot infections
Anna Selva Olid1, Ivan Solà, Leticia A Barajas-Nava
1Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), C. Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, Pavelló 18 I Planta 0, Barcelona, Spain, 08025.
Systemic antibiotics are crucial for diabetic foot infections (DFIs), but evidence on the best treatment is limited. While ertapenem showed promise over tigecycline, overall antibiotic effectiveness and safety for DFIs remain unclear due to study limitations.
Area of Science:
- Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) represent a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating systemic antibiotic therapy.
- The selection of appropriate systemic antibiotics for DFIs is critical due to the high risk of non-traumatic amputation in diabetic patients.
Background:
- Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are the leading cause of non-traumatic amputations in individuals with diabetes.
- Current treatment often involves empirical systemic antibiotic therapy, but optimal drug selection remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of various systemic antibiotics for treating diabetic foot infections (DFIs).
- To compare systemic antibiotics against other treatments, including topical care or placebo, for DFIs.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic antibiotics for DFIs.
- Searches were conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Wounds Group, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL, up to April 2015.
- Primary outcomes included clinical resolution, time to resolution, complications, and adverse effects of antibiotic treatments.
Main Results:
- Twenty trials involving 3791 participants were included, exhibiting significant heterogeneity in design, population, and interventions.
- Ertapenem (with or without vancomycin) demonstrated higher clinical resolution rates compared to tigecycline in one large, low-risk trial.
- Carbapenems showed fewer adverse effects than anti-pseudomonal penicillins, and daptomycin had fewer adverse effects than vancomycin; however, linezolid and tigecycline were associated with more adverse effects in specific comparisons.
Conclusions:
- The evidence comparing systemic antibiotics for DFIs is limited by heterogeneity and high risk of bias, making definitive conclusions difficult.
- While ertapenem showed superiority over tigecycline, the relative efficacy and safety of most other systemic antibiotics for DFIs remain unclear.
- Future research should prioritize blinded outcome assessments, standardized infection severity criteria, clear outcome measures, and defined treatment durations to improve evidence quality.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:


