Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Variation in utilization of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: influence of hospital volume
Nilay Patel1, Sadip Pant, Sidakpal S Panaich
1aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey bDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky cDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan dCardiology Division, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida eDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital fDivision of Cardiology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York gInterventional Cardiology, The Everett Clinic, Everett, Washington, USA.
Insights
Multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions (MVPCI) utilization varies significantly across US hospitals. Higher hospital volume and patient age predict increased MVPCI use, while factors like female sex and urgent admissions predict decreased use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are a cornerstone of managing coronary artery disease.
- Multivessel PCI (MVPCI) involves treating multiple coronary arteries in a single procedure.
- Understanding trends in MVPCI utilization is crucial for healthcare resource allocation and quality improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate contemporary trends in the utilization of multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions (MVPCI) in the USA.
- To identify patient and hospital-level factors associated with MVPCI use.
- To assess the variability in MVPCI utilization across different hospitals.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006-2011).
- Employed International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes to identify MVPCI procedures.
- Developed a hierarchical three-level model adjusted for confounding factors to analyze utilization predictors.
Main Results:
- Over 2.6 million procedures were analyzed, with significant variation in MVPCI utilization observed.
- Older age and higher comorbidity scores (≥2) were associated with increased MVPCI utilization.
- Female sex, myocardial infarction, weekend/urgent admissions were associated with decreased MVPCI utilization, while higher hospital volume predicted increased use.
- A substantial between-hospital variation (7.7%) in MVPCI use was noted, minimally influenced by patient or hospital characteristics.
Conclusions:
- MVPCI utilization rates exhibit considerable variability among US hospitals.
- Higher annual hospital volume is a significant predictor of increased MVPCI utilization.
- Patient demographics and clinical factors influence MVPCI use, highlighting the need for standardized treatment protocols.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the contemporary trends in the utilization of multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions (MVPCIs) in the USA.
Methods:
We queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2006 and 2011 using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes 00.40 (single stent), 00.46, 00.47, and 00.48 (single vessel and multiple stents) and 00.41, 00.42 and 00.43 (MVPCI). We built a hierarchical three-level model adjusted for multiple confounding factors.
Results:
A total of 543 434 (weighted: 2 683 206) procedures were identified. Independent predictors of increased MVPCI utilization (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, P-value) were found to be age (1.05, 1.04-1.07, P<0.001) and comorbid conditions on using Deyo's modification of Charlson's comorbidity index of at least 2 (1.13, 1.09-1.16, P<0.001). Female sex (0.88, 0.87-0.90, P<0.001), myocardial infarction (0.86, 0.83-0.89, P<0.001), weekend admissions (0.94, 0.91-0.96, P<0.001), and urgent admissions (0.88, 0.83-0.93, P<0.001) predicted decreased utilization. Highest quartile of hospital (1.34, 1.16-1.54, P<0.001) predicted higher utilization. Between-hospital variation of 7.7% (interclass correlation coefficient) was observed, which was minimally affected by patient or hospital mix. A randomly selected patient was ∼1.6 (median odds ratio) times more likely to receive an MVPCI from a given hospital compared with another identical patient being treated at a different random hospital.
Conclusion:
The utilization rate of MVPCI varied considerably among hospitals. Higher annual hospital volume was associated with a higher utilization rate of MVPCI.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
08:12Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview