Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL DURING PERFORMANCE OF A DYNAMIC BALANCE TASK IN SUBJECTS WITH AND WITHOUT ANKLE INSTABILITY
Federico Pozzi1, Marilyn Moffat2, Gregory Gutierrez2
1Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Design:
Cross-sectional, controlled laboratory study.
Background:
Lateral ankle sprains are common injuries and often lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). Individuals who previously sustained a lateral ankle sprain, but did not develop CAI, termed copers, may have altered postural control strategies compared to individuals who have developed CAI. These altered postural control strategies may allow for more appropriate dynamic stabilization of the ankle joint after injury compared to those seen in patients who have developed CAI.
Objective:
To compare lower leg biomechanics, as well as electromyographic (EMG) activation of the tibilias anterior and peroneus longus muscles, during the posteromedial reach of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in individuals with healthy ankles, copers, and those with CAI.
Participants And Methods:
30 participants (12 control, 9 copers, 9 CAI) divided into three groups based on ankle sprain history and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score. Kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data were collected during three posteromedial reach trials on the SEBT.
Main Outcome Measures:
Primary outcome measures include SEBT normalized reach distance in the posteromedial direction and average integrated EMG activation of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus muscles during the reach. Secondary outcome measures included sagittal and frontal plane ankle complex angles and moments and sagittal plane knee angles and moments. Data were analyzed between groups using a one-way ANOVA model.
Results:
No significant differences in reach distance or kinematic and kinetic outcomes were found between groups. The activation of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus muscles was significantly different between groups (p=0.033 and p=0.014, respectively). The post-hoc analysis revealed that the coper group had significantly higher muscle activation compared to the control group, but not to the CAI group.
Conclusion:
CAI did not alter kinematic, kinetic, or reach performance during the SEBT. When compared to controls, copers appeared to have greater activation of the ankle musculature, which may increase stability of the ankle complex during a dynamic balance task.
Level Of Evidence:
Prospective Cohort level II.
