Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Initial development and testing of an instrument for patient self-assessment of adverse drug reactions
Narumol Jarernsiripornkul1, Nataporn Chaipichit1, Thongchai Pratipanawatr2
1Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Purpose:
To develop and conduct preliminary testing of a causality assessment tool for patients, for potential use in encouraging both discussions with clinicians about suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and reporting to authorities.
Methods:
Ten causality statements, developed from qualitative studies involving patients, with a scoring system allowing categorization, were embedded in a questionnaire which also included a symptom checklist and additional details about one suspected ADR and medicine, selected for causality assessment. Patients with experiences of suspected ADRs were involved in cognitive interviews (15), piloting (20) and psychometric testing (120). Test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion-related validity were evaluated, through repeated causality assessment, comparison with a visual analogue scale assessing certainty of causality and comparison with causality assessment using World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria, respectively. The study involved outpatients at a university hospital in northeast Thailand.
Results:
Ninety-eight patients completed causality assessment twice: both causality scores (Spearman rs = 0.715; p < 0.001) and causality classification [percentage of positive agreement (PPA) = 68.4; κ = 0.419; p < 0.001] showed satisfactory reliability. Causality scores were positively correlated with certainty of causality (Spearman rs = 0.556; p < 0.01). There was moderate agreement against WHO-UMC criteria [PPA = 70.4; κ = 0.440; p < 0.001]. Of the 91 completing an evaluation, 88% agreed that the tool should be used routinely, 78% agreed that it gave them useful results and 80% agreed that it was easy to use.
Conclusions:
This novel instrument has satisfactory psychometric properties and was acceptable to Thai patients, but it requires further testing. It has potential for use in supporting patients with suspected ADRs to discuss these with health professionals, and perhaps to report directly.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions

