Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Best (but oft forgotten) practices: testing for treatment effects in randomized trials by separate analyses of
J Martin Bland1, Douglas G Altman2
1Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom; and martin.bland@york.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Researchers often analyze randomized trials and other comparative studies by separate analysis of changes from baseline in each parallel group. This may be the only analysis presented or it may be in addition to the direct comparison of allocated groups. We illustrate this by reference to 3 recently published nutritional trials. We show why this method of analysis may be highly misleading and may produce type I errors far greater than the 5% that we expect. We recommend direct comparison of means between groups with the use of baseline as a covariate if required.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Behrens–Fisher Test
This test...
Group Design

