Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microsoft Excel: Plotting Mean, SD, and SE01:18

Microsoft Excel: Plotting Mean, SD, and SE

1.6K
In Microsoft Excel, plotting the mean along with standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE) helps visualize data variability and reliability. To plot these values, follow these steps:
First, calculate the mean, SD, and SE of your data. The mean is obtained using the formula `=AVERAGE(range)`, while SD can be calculated with `=STDEV.P(range)` for a population or `=STDEV.S(range)` for a sample. SE is calculated as `=SD/SQRT(n)`, where `n` is the sample size.
To plot these values, use a bar...
1.6K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

13.1K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
13.1K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

10.6K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
10.6K
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation01:13

Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation

14.0K
The range rule of thumb in statistics helps us calculate a dataset's minimum and maximum values with known standard deviation. This rule is based on the concept that 95% of all values in a dataset lie within two standard deviations from the mean.
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height...
14.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

9.1K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
9.1K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

666
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
666

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Make the Unhearable Visible: Exploring Visualization for Musical Instrument Practice.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

An Autoethnography on Visualization Literacy: A Wicked Measurement Problem.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Visual Stenography: Feature Recreation and Preservation in Sketches of Noisy Line Charts.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

From Dashboard Zoo to Census: A Case Study With Tableau Public.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024
Same author

RSVP for VPSA : A Meta Design Study on Rapid Suggestive Visualization Prototyping for Visual Parameter Space Analysis.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024
Same author

Beware of Validation by Eye: Visual Validation of Linear Trends in Scatterplots.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.6K

Error Bars Considered Harmful: Exploring Alternate Encodings for Mean and Error.

Michael Correll, Michael Gleicher

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
    |September 11, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary

    Visualizing uncertain data is crucial. Bar charts with error bars are misleading; gradient and violin plots better represent mean and error for clearer statistical inference.

    More Related Videos

    Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
    06:58

    Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

    Published on: January 24, 2020

    7.9K
    Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
    08:25

    Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

    Published on: December 6, 2024

    1.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

    Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
    05:39

    Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

    Published on: March 18, 2019

    5.6K
    Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
    06:58

    Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

    Published on: January 24, 2020

    7.9K
    Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
    08:25

    Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

    Published on: December 6, 2024

    1.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Data visualization
    • Statistical inference
    • Human-computer interaction

    Background:

    • Measurement error and confidence intervals are vital for interpreting uncertain data.
    • Bar charts with error bars are a common but often misunderstood visualization for statistical data.
    • Effective visual communication of statistical uncertainty is challenging for general audiences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the drawbacks of standard bar charts with error bars for representing statistical uncertainty.
    • To explore alternative visualization methods for communicating mean and error data.
    • To improve decision-making with uncertain data through better visual encodings.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducted a series of crowd-sourced experiments.
    • Compared viewer decisions using different visual encodings of mean and error.
    • Analyzed how visual presentation impacts statistical inference.

    Main Results:

    • The encoding of mean and error significantly influences how viewers interpret uncertain data.
    • Standard bar charts with error bars can lead to flawed judgments.
    • Alternative visualizations like gradient plots and violin plots show promise.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of visualization significantly impacts human reasoning with uncertain data.
    • Gradient plots and violin plots are superior alternatives to bar charts with error bars for inferential tasks.
    • Optimizing visual design enhances statistical inference for a general audience.