Performing red reflex eye examinations increases the rate of neonatal conjunctivitis

Irena Ulanovsky1,2, Morya Shnaider1,2, Yuval Geffen2,3

  • 1Department of Neonatology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

Insights

Red reflex eye exams may increase clinical conjunctivitis risk in newborns. While conjunctival swab sampling rose, bacterial conjunctivitis rates remained unchanged, suggesting the procedure is safe for neonates.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal ophthalmology
  • Infectious disease epidemiology

Background:

  • Red reflex examinations are crucial for detecting neonatal eye conditions.
  • Eyelid manipulation during these exams raises concerns about potential infection transmission.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between red reflex examinations and neonatal conjunctivitis.
  • To compare conjunctivitis rates before and after implementing the procedure.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study of 18,872 neonates across two birth periods (2008-2009 and 2010-2011).
  • Comparison of clinical conjunctivitis, bacterial conjunctivitis, and bacterial growth rates between the periods.
  • Analysis of factors associated with conjunctivitis, including delivery mode and length of stay.

Main Results:

  • Clinical conjunctivitis rates significantly increased in the 2010-2011 period (p = 0.029).
  • Increased odds of clinical conjunctivitis were linked to the later study period (OR 1.22), male gender (OR 1.31), and longer length of stay (OR 1.19).
  • Bacterial conjunctivitis rates and bacterial growth percentages did not differ significantly between the study periods.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical conjunctivitis showed a significant association with the later study period, male gender, and length of stay.
  • Conjunctival swab sampling increased post-implementation, but bacterial conjunctivitis and growth rates remained stable.
  • The findings suggest that while clinical conjunctivitis increased, the risk of bacterial infection from red reflex examinations is not elevated.
Abstract