Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Relationship between stent type and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial
Adnan K Chhatriwalla1, Lakshmi Venkitachalam2, Kevin F Kennedy3
1Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
Insights
Drug-eluting stents (DES) offer temporary health benefits after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These benefits in quality of life and function were not sustained at 12 months post-procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) are known to reduce restenosis compared to bare-metal stents (BMS).
- The impact of stent type on patient health status following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.
- This study investigates the association between DES versus BMS and health status outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if drug-eluting stent (DES) use is associated with improved health status outcomes compared to bare-metal stent (BMS) use in patients undergoing PCI.
- To evaluate health status at 6 and 12 months post-PCI in patients treated with DES or BMS.
- To assess the long-term impact of stent type on patient well-being after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2,694 patients with AMI from the TRIUMPH and PREMIER registries who underwent PCI.
- Comparison of health status at 6 and 12 months using Seattle Angina Questionnaire, SF-12, and PHQ-9.
- Propensity score matching created comparable cohorts of 784 patients treated with DES and 784 with BMS.
Main Results:
- Both DES and BMS groups showed significant health status improvements at 6 and 12 months post-PCI.
- DES use was linked to a small, statistically significant improvement in quality of life and functional limitation scores at 6 months (p < .01).
- These health status benefits associated with DES were not sustained at the 12-month follow-up (p > .10).
Conclusions:
- In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, drug-eluting stent (DES) use demonstrated transient health status benefits.
- The observed improvements in quality of life and function with DES were not sustained beyond 6 months.
- This suggests that while DES may offer short-term advantages, long-term health status differences compared to BMS are minimal in this population.
Background:
Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis, as compared with bare-metal stents (BMS); however, the relationship between stent type and health status is unknown. We examined whether stent type was associated with health status outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods And Results:
We evaluated 6- and 12-month health status in 2,694 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) enrolled in the TRIUMPH and PREMIER registries who underwent PCI with DES (n = 1,361) or BMS (n = 1,333). Health status was assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12, and Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale. Propensity matching was performed to account for baseline differences in patient characteristics, resulting in a comparison cohort of 784 patients treated with DES and 784 patients treated with BMS. Both groups experienced significant improvements in health status at 6 and 12 months after PCI. Drug-eluting stent use was associated with a small improvement in Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality of life and functional limitation scores at 6 months (3.6 [95% CI 0.96-6.21], P = .007, and 3.8 [1.55-6.01], P < .001, respectively), but not at 12 months (2.3 [-0.46 to 5.03], P = .10, and 0.3 [-2.04 to 2.48], P = .85, respectively).
Conclusions:
In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, DES use was associated with transient but unsustained health status benefits over 12 months after AMI.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Angina IV: Management
