18F-FDG-PET/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET/CT

Andrei Samarin1, Martin Hüllner, Marcelo A Queiroz

  • 1Departments of aNuclear Medicine bDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology cDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich dUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland eDepartment of Medical Radiology, North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.

Abstract

Insights

Fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG)-PET/MRI improves reader confidence and lesion conspicuity for bone metastases compared to F-FDG-PET/CT. Detection rates were similar, but PET/MRI shows promise for early-stage metastatic disease.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Nuclear Medicine

Background:

  • Bone metastases are a common complication of various cancers.
  • Accurate detection and characterization of bone metastases are crucial for treatment planning and patient management.
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (F-FDG-PET) is a valuable tool for identifying metabolically active bone lesions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of F-FDG-PET/Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging versus F-FDG-PET/Computed Tomography (CT) in detecting F-FDG avid bone metastases.
  • To assess lesion conspicuity and reader confidence between the two imaging modalities.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 24 patients with 30 paired F-FDG-PET/CT and F-FDG-PET/MR examinations.
  • Evaluation of PET-positive bone lesions for presence, conspicuity, and correlation with morphological imaging (MR or CT).
  • Comparison of reader confidence using statistical tests (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, Student's t-test).

Main Results:

  • Both PET/CT and PET/MR detected 86 F-FDG-positive bone lesions.
  • Morphological correlates were found on MR in 82/86 lesions and on CT in 65/86 lesions.
  • Lesion conspicuity was significantly better on MR imaging (T1 fat) compared to CT (P=0.005), and reader confidence increased with PET/MR in 7/30 studies.

Conclusions:

  • F-FDG-PET/MRI demonstrates superior lesion conspicuity and enhanced reader confidence for bone metastases compared to F-FDG-PET/CT.
  • Overall detection rates for bone metastases were comparable between the two methods.
  • PET/MRI holds significant clinical potential, particularly for patients with limited or early-stage bone metastatic disease.