Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Phosphopeptide Enrichment Coupled with Label-free Quantitative Mass Spectrometry to Investigate the Phosphoproteome in Prostate Cancer
Published on: August 2, 2018
Identification and relative quantification of phosphopeptides by a combination of multi-protease digestion and
Dennis Linke1, Tomas Koudelka1, Alexander Becker1
1Institut für Experimentelle Medizin - AG Systematische Proteomforschung und Bioanalytik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Rationale:
The identification and the determination of the extent of protein phosphorylation are major prerequisites for the comparative analysis of this important posttranslational modification of proteins in different biological situations. High sequence coverages and the availability of straightforward quantification methods are necessary to achieve these goals.
Methods:
Phosphoproteins and non-phosphorylated analogues separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were digested using four different proteases (trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase and GluC) and the digests were isobarically labeled using eight-plex iTRAQ. The combined labeled digests were subsequently enriched using titanium dioxide and both the phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated fractions were analyzed by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS). The influence of different data analysis algorithms (Percolator or False Discovery Rate) on the outcome of analysis was investigated.
Results:
Almost complete sequence coverage could be achieved upon application of a multi-protease approach. The formation of peptides of different lengths and physicochemical properties allowed the identification and the mapping of all phosphorylation sites in the investigated model proteins. The introduction of isobaric labels allowed quantification of different peptides of the same phosphorylation site with more than one peptide, leading to significantly improved statistical confidence.
Conclusions:
A workflow for the straightforward comparative analysis of protein phosphorylation in samples of low complexity, e.g. isolated proteins, was developed. The workflow is transferable to other posttranslational modifications.
More Related Videos
10:17A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors
Published on: April 29, 2022
10:37Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017