Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Differences Between US and UK Adults in Stroke Preparedness: Evidence From Parallel Population-Based Community
Stephan U Dombrowski1, Gary A Ford2, Lewis B Morgenstern2
1From the Division of Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK (S.U.D.); Institute for Ageing & Health (G.A.F.) and Institute of Health & Society (M.W., F.F.S., J.E.M.), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK (G.A.F.); Stroke Program, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan (L.B.M., L.E.S.); Centre for Diet & Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK (M.W.); Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translation Research in Public Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (F.F.S.); and Institute of Medical Sociology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (P.G.). s.u.dombrowski@stir.ac.uk.
Background And Purpose:
Although time-dependent treatment is available, most people delay contacting emergency medical services for stroke. Given differences in the healthcare system and public health campaigns, exploring between-country differences in stroke preparedness may identify novel ways to increase acute stroke treatment.
Methods:
A survey was mailed to population-based samples in Ingham County, Michigan, US (n=2500), and Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (n=2500). Surveys included stroke perceptions and stroke/nonstroke scenarios to assess recognition and response to stroke. Between-country differences and associations with stroke preparedness were examined using t tests and linear mixed models.
Results:
Overall response rate was 27.4%. The mean age of participants was 55 years, and 58% were female. US participants were better in recognizing stroke (70% versus 63%, d=0.27) and were more likely to call emergency medical services (55% versus 52%, d=0.11). After controlling for demographics and comorbidities, US participants remained more likely to recognize stroke but were not more likely to respond appropriately. A greater belief that medical treatment can help with stroke and understanding of stroke was associated with improved stroke recognition and response.
Conclusions:
Overall, stroke recognition and response were moderate. US participants were modestly better at recognizing stroke, although there was little difference in response to stroke. Future stroke awareness interventions could focus more on stroke outcome expectations and developing a greater understanding of stroke among the public.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
01:27Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...
01:21Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult