Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
06:31
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
7.8K
Modeling of T2* decay in vertebral bone marrow fat quantification
Dimitrios C Karampinos1, Stefan Ruschke1, Michael Dieckmeyer1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
NMR in Biomedicine
|October 2, 2015
Summary
T2' correction using known T2 values accurately quantifies vertebral bone marrow fat fraction. This method overcomes biases from short T2* relaxation times, improving bone health assessments and cancer treatment monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Bone marrow fat fraction mapping is crucial for assessing bone health and cancer treatment effects.
- Vertebral bone marrow's short T2* relaxation times can interfere with accurate fat quantification.
- Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation is a key imaging technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare different T2* correction methods for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat imaging in vertebral bone marrow.
- To evaluate these methods against single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference standard.
- To identify the optimal T2* correction approach for reliable fat fraction mapping.
Main Methods:
- Eight-echo gradient-echo imaging and single-voxel MRS were performed on the L3-L5 spine of 25 healthy volunteers.
- Four T2* correction approaches were evaluated: single-T2*, dual-T2*, T2' with known T2 from MRS, and T2' with average known T2.
- Quantitative analysis involved linear regression comparing imaging-derived and MRS-derived fat fractions.
Main Results:
- Dual-T2* correction yielded noisier fat fraction maps compared to single-T2* or T2' correction.
- Single-T2* and dual-T2* corrections resulted in regression slopes significantly different from 1.
- T2' correction using a priori-known T2 demonstrated a slope not significantly different from 1, with minimal intercept bias and high R(2) values.
Conclusions:
- T2' correction utilizing a priori-known T2 effectively removes fat fraction bias caused by T2* differences between water and fat.
- This method maintains excellent noise performance in vertebral bone marrow fat fraction mapping.
- Accurate fat quantification via T2' correction enhances the utility of MRI in bone health and oncology research.

