Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

06:59
A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
31.6K
Hospital Disaster Preparedness Tools: a Systematic Review.
Esmail Heidaranlu1, Abbas Ebadi2, Hamid Reza Khankeh3
1Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Plos Currents
|October 2, 2015
Summary
Current hospital disaster preparedness tools lack validity and reliability, particularly in assessing functional aspects. Developing new, expert-informed tools is crucial for accurate hospital accreditation and effective emergency response planning.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Disaster Medicine
- Health Policy
Background:
- Hospital disaster preparedness is essential for accreditation and effective emergency response.
- Existing evaluation tools often lack robust psychometric properties, impacting their reliability and validity.
- Assessing preparedness is critical for ensuring healthcare facilities can withstand and manage disaster events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of outcome measures used in hospital disaster preparedness tools.
- To assess the psychometric properties (measurement level, reliability, validity) of current tools.
- To identify weaknesses in existing hospital disaster preparedness evaluation instruments.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search identified 140 studies published between 2000 and 2014.
- PRISMA guidelines were used to appraise studies utilizing hospital disaster preparedness tools.
- The World Health Organization Criteria for Hospital Preparedness and COSMIN criteria assessed content quality and psychometric properties.
Main Results:
- Only 33 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review.
- Eleven distinct hospital disaster preparedness tools were identified across the selected studies.
- The evaluated tools predominantly focused on structural and non-structural preparedness, neglecting key functional aspects.
Conclusions:
- Current hospital disaster preparedness tools exhibit significant weaknesses in psychometric properties.
- There is a critical need for the development of valid and reliable preparedness evaluation tools.
- Future tool development should involve expert knowledge and rigorous psychometric evaluation processes.

