Pericarditis in acute myocardial infarction: characterization and clinical significance
G H Tofler1, J E Muller, P H Stone
1Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
To determine the significance of pericarditis following acute myocardial infarction, the hospital course and 12-month follow-up were analyzed in 703 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). Pericarditis, defined by the detection of a pericardial rub, occurred in 20% of the patients (n = 141) and was more likely to follow Q wave than non-Q wave infarction (25% vs 9%, p less than 0.001). Patients with pericarditis experienced more serious myocardial damage compared to those without pericarditis, as evidenced by a larger infarct size (25 +/- 1 vs 17 +/- 1 MB-CK gm-Eq/m2, p less than 0.001), a lower admission left ventricular ejection fraction (42 +/- 1% vs 48 +/- 1%, p less than 0.001), and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (47% vs 26%, p less than 0.001) and atrial tachyarrhythmias (16% vs 10%, p less than 0.05). When patients were classified by the presence of Q or non-Q wave infarction, these differences persisted although statistical significance was not always achieved due to smaller sample size. Mortality at 12-month follow-up for patients with pericarditis was 18% compared with 12% for patients without pericarditis (p = 0.055). This mortality difference could be accounted for in part by the lower ventricular ejection fraction in patients with pericarditis (p = 0.20 after adjustment).
To determine the significance of pericarditis following acute myocardial infarction, the hospital course and 12-month follow-up were analyzed in 703 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). Pericarditis, defined by the detection of a pericardial rub, occurred in 20% of the patients (n = 141) and was more likely to follow Q wave than non-Q wave infarction (25% vs 9%, p less than 0.001). Patients with pericarditis experienced more serious myocardial damage compared to those without pericarditis, as evidenced by a larger infarct size (25 +/- 1 vs 17 +/- 1 MB-CK gm-Eq/m2, p less than 0.001), a lower admission left ventricular ejection fraction (42 +/- 1% vs 48 +/- 1%, p less than 0.001), and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (47% vs 26%, p less than 0.001) and atrial tachyarrhythmias (16% vs 10%, p less than 0.05). When patients were classified by the presence of Q or non-Q wave infarction, these differences persisted although statistical significance was not always achieved due to smaller sample size. Mortality at 12-month follow-up for patients with pericarditis was 18% compared with 12% for patients without pericarditis (p = 0.055). This mortality difference could be accounted for in part by the lower ventricular ejection fraction in patients with pericarditis (p = 0.20 after adjustment).
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations


