Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed
Greg Ogrinc1, Louise Davies1, Daisy Goodman2
1White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines were updated to SQUIRE 2.0. This revision enhances reporting for healthcare quality improvement initiatives, focusing on theory, context, and interventions.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Scientific Reporting Standards
Background:
- The initial Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) were published in 2008.
- Significant advancements in healthcare quality improvement science necessitate updated reporting guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the development and key components of the revised SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines.
- To provide a standardized framework for reporting healthcare improvement efforts.
Main Methods:
- Revision process involved semistructured interviews, focus groups, and feedback from an international steering group.
- Two consensus meetings were held to develop interim drafts.
- Pilot testing with authors and a public comment period informed the final guidelines.
Main Results:
- SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes three core components for reporting improvement work: theory, context, and intervention.
- The guidelines accommodate the complexity and multidimensional nature of healthcare improvement methods.
- A common platform is established for scholarly dissemination of healthcare improvement discoveries.
Conclusions:
- SQUIRE 2.0 offers an updated, comprehensive framework for reporting healthcare quality improvement research.
- The guidelines aim to improve the clarity and consistency of scholarly communication in this field.
- Adherence to SQUIRE 2.0 will facilitate the sharing and advancement of healthcare improvement science.
More Related Videos
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Quality Assurance
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Standards of Care I
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...