Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Birth-weight charts and immigrant populations: A critical review
Marcelo L Urquia1, Ingvil K Sørbye2, Susitha Wanigaratne3
1Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Insights
Newborn size differences across populations require careful interpretation. Birth-weight (BW) charts are screening tools, not diagnostic, especially for immigrant populations, to ensure equitable obstetric and neonatal care.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal epidemiology
- Neonatal health
- Public health
Background:
- Literature increasingly examines newborn size variations across racial, ethnic, and immigrant groups.
- Interpreting these differences as pathological versus normal variability is complex and impacts care for minority populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically assess methodological issues in newborn size assessment.
- To explore implications for minority and immigrant populations.
- To evaluate different birth-weight (BW) chart types for assessing abnormal newborn size.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on newborn size assessment methodologies.
- Critical analysis of single local, minority-specific, and international BW chart references.
- Discussion of the utility and limitations of BW charts in diverse populations.
Main Results:
- Newborn size alone is insufficient for clinical decisions; BW charts serve as screening, not diagnostic, tools.
- Parental minority status can be a marker for further risk factor inquiry, especially for immigrants with incomplete medical histories.
Conclusions:
- Standardized interpretation of newborn size is crucial for equitable care.
- Clinical decisions should integrate BW chart screening with individual risk assessments.
- Further research and refined clinical practices are needed for diverse newborn populations.
Abstract:
There is an increasing body of literature focusing on differences in newborn size between different population subgroups defined by racial, ethnic, and immigration status. The interpretation of these differences as pathological or as merely reflecting normal variability is not straightforward and may have consequences for the provision of obstetric and neonatal care to minority populations. In this review, we critically assess some methodological issues affecting the assessment of newborn size and their potential implications for minority populations. In particular, we discuss the pros and cons of different types of newborn birth-weight (BW) charts (i.e., single local population-based references, minority-specific references, and a single international standard) to determine abnormal newborn size, with emphasis on immigrant populations. We conclude that size alone is not enough to inform clinical decisions and that all newborn size charts should be used as screening tools, not as diagnostic tools. Parental minority status may be regarded as a marker and used to further inquire about individual risk factors, particularly among immigrants who may not have a complete medical history in the new country. Finally, we outline areas for further research and recommendations for clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Applications of Life Tables
Interpreting Run Charts
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

