Revising Recommendations and Outcome Measurements after Complex Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
1Department of Surgery, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
The American Surgeon
|October 15, 2015
Summary
Complex abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes were evaluated, revealing high complication rates but successful restoration after reoperation. Biologic mesh use and infection history were linked to reoperation, suggesting restricted use and grading modifications.
Area of Science:
- Abdominal wall reconstruction
- Surgical outcomes research
- Hernia repair complications
Background:
- Current Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grading for complex abdominal wall reconstruction focuses narrowly on surgical site occurrence (SSO) and recurrence.
- Existing systems do not adequately assess long-term functional restoration or complication management following complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
- A need exists to evaluate comprehensive outcomes beyond initial SSO and recurrence rates in complex hernia repairs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish reoperation rates for complex open abdominal wall reconstruction.
- To compare long-term outcomes with existing Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) grading criteria.
- To identify factors associated with reoperation and long-term success in complex hernia repairs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 125 complex open abdominal wall reconstructions with loss of domain and >200 cm(2) defects.
- Minimum 24-month follow-up, with an average follow-up of 47 months.
- Analysis of surgical site occurrences (SSO), reoperation rates, and overall restoration success.
Main Results:
- Surgical site occurrence (SSO) rates were 9% (Grade I), 45% (Grade II), and 55% (Grade III), exceeding VHWG published rates.
- Forty-three of 59 patients with complications achieved successful restoration after reoperation, yielding an 87% overall restoration rate.
- Biologic mesh use and a history of infection were independently associated with increased reoperation rates.
Conclusions:
- While SSO rates were higher than VHWG benchmarks, high salvage rates were achieved through reoperation.
- Biologic mesh demonstrated poor outcomes, particularly in contaminated or clean fields, recommending restricted use.
- Modifications to the VHWG grading system and recommendations are suggested to better reflect comprehensive outcomes.


