Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Identifying Pediatric Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Accuracy of Diagnosis Codes
Fran Balamuth1, Scott L Weiss1, Matt Hall2
1Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Insights
Sepsis-specific ICD codes accurately identify pediatric severe sepsis in administrative data. This method is more effective than using combined infection and organ dysfunction codes for identifying pediatric sepsis cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Health informatics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate identification of pediatric sepsis is crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes.
- Administrative data, particularly International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, are often used for case ascertainment.
- Established methods for identifying sepsis using administrative codes require validation against a reference standard.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of two administrative methods for identifying pediatric severe sepsis.
- To compare the performance of sepsis-specific ICD codes versus a combination of infection and organ dysfunction codes.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective study involving 6 US children's hospitals.
- Children aged >60 days to <19 years were analyzed.
- Reference standard severe sepsis was determined by consensus criteria, with comparison to ICD codes (sepsis codes vs. combination codes).
Main Results:
- Out of 432 subjects, 130 met the reference standard for severe sepsis.
- Sepsis codes demonstrated a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 92%.
- Combination codes had lower performance, with a sensitivity of 15% and specificity of 71%.
Conclusions:
- Sepsis-specific ICD codes are more accurate in identifying pediatric severe sepsis in administrative data.
- The findings support the use of sepsis-specific codes for administrative case identification in pediatric populations.
- Further refinement by including codes for sepsis therapies may offer slight improvements in case identification accuracy.
Objectives:
To evaluate accuracy of 2 established administrative methods of identifying children with sepsis using a medical record review reference standard.
Study Design:
Multicenter retrospective study at 6 US children's hospitals. Subjects were children >60 days to <19 years of age and identified in 4 groups based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes: (1) severe sepsis/septic shock (sepsis codes); (2) infection plus organ dysfunction (combination codes); (3) subjects without codes for infection, organ dysfunction, or severe sepsis; and (4) infection but not severe sepsis or organ dysfunction. Combination codes were allowed, but not required within the sepsis codes group. We determined the presence of reference standard severe sepsis according to consensus criteria. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether addition of codes for sepsis therapies improved case identification.
Results:
A total of 130 out of 432 subjects met reference SD of severe sepsis. Sepsis codes had sensitivity 73% (95% CI 70-86), specificity 92% (95% CI 87-95), and positive predictive value 79% (95% CI 70-86). Combination codes had sensitivity 15% (95% CI 9-22), specificity 71% (95% CI 65-76), and positive predictive value 18% (95% CI 11-27). Slight improvements in model characteristics were observed when codes for vasoactive medications and endotracheal intubation were added to sepsis codes (c-statistic 0.83 vs 0.87, P = .008).
Conclusions:
Sepsis specific International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes identify pediatric patients with severe sepsis in administrative data more accurately than a combination of codes for infection plus organ dysfunction.
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
