Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Induction and Assessment of Levodopa-induced Dyskinesias in a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease
Published on: October 14, 2021
Scheduled versus Pro Re Nata Dosing in the VIEW Trials
Gisbert Richard1, Jordi Monés2, Sebastian Wolf3
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Switching treatment regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) at week 52 impacted visual acuity (VA) outcomes in the VIEW studies. Some patients experienced vision loss in the second year, suggesting W52 was a critical inflection point.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Diseases
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss.
- The VIEW studies evaluated intravitreal treatments for AMD.
- Treatment regimens often involve adjustments over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze visual acuity (VA) outcomes before and after a preplanned treatment regimen change at week 52 (W52) in the VIEW studies.
- To identify potential subgroups experiencing different outcomes post-regimen change.
Main Methods:
- Post hoc analyses of 2,457 neovascular AMD patients from two multicenter, multinational, double-masked trials.
- Patients received ranibizumab or aflibercept with varying dosing schedules up to W52, followed by a capped pro re nata (PRN) regimen until W96.
- Best-corrected VA (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography were assessed throughout.
Main Results:
- Approximately 20% of patients lost 5 or more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters after W52 with PRN treatment.
- Patients experiencing significant vision loss early in the PRN phase did not recover vision.
- No significant differences in serious ocular adverse events or arterial thromboembolic events were observed between groups.
Conclusions:
- A subgroup of patients showed less stable VA outcomes in the second year of the VIEW studies.
- Week 52, marking a treatment regimen switch, appears to be an important inflection point for VA outcomes.
- The change in treatment regimen at W52 is a plausible explanation for observed outcome variations.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview
Typically, the starting dose and dosing interval are guided by the manufacturer's recommendations based on clinical trials conducted during and after drug...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients