Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

3.9K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.9K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.1K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.1K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Test Cross01:39

Test Cross

44.7K
Alleles are different forms of the same gene. Humans and other diploid organisms inherit two alleles of every gene, one from each parent.
44.7K
Test Cross01:39

Test Cross

2.3K
2.3K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

29.8K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
29.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk Factors for Mortality and Age at Discharge in Preterm Infants with Congenital Heart Disease.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Distribution of Total Hip Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Infection Care in the United States: Reported from the American Joint Replacement Registry.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

United States Trends in Utilization and One-Year Revision Risk of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of American Joint Replacement Registry Data.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Improvement science as the engine for the next generation of learning health networks.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Comparative Outcomes of Modular Versus Monoblock Fluted Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An American Joint Replacement Registry Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes according to social determinants of health.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
Same journal

Imaging Actionable Incidental Findings: Communication and Follow Up to Eliminate Preventable Harm.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Using Deming's System of Profound Knowledge to Form Quality Focused Age-Friendly Teams.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Aligning Thrombophilia Testing With Evidence-Based Guidelines: The Impact of Clinical Decision Support Redesign in an Academic Medical Center.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

The Interrater Reliability of Cardiac Arrest Video Review: A Pilot Study.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Improving Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging the Gap.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
Same journal

Management Modality of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms is Associated with Lower Rates of Follow-Up.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

15.0K

Orchestrated Testing.

Eugenia K Pallotto1,2, John Chuo3,4, Anthony J Piazza5,6

  • 11 Children's Mercy-Kansas City, MO.

American Journal of Medical Quality : the Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality
|October 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Orchestrated testing (OT) helps health collaboratives understand which interventions improve patient outcomes. This planned experimentation method efficiently tests multiple practices simultaneously to identify effective strategies.

Keywords:
orchestrated testingpatient safetyplanned experimentationquality improvementstatistical process control

More Related Videos

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

16.4K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

15.0K
Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

16.4K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health services research
  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Healthcare quality improvement

Background:

  • Health care quality improvement collaboratives use care bundles to enhance patient outcomes.
  • The individual impact of each care bundle component is often not quantified.
  • Understanding the effectiveness of specific interventions within bundles is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the process for designing and implementing Orchestrated Testing (OT) within quality improvement collaboratives.
  • To demonstrate the practical application of OT using a multicenter study reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections.
  • To provide a framework for systematically evaluating interventions in healthcare settings.

Main Methods:

  • Orchestrated Testing (OT) applies planned experimentation to simultaneously assess multiple practices (bundle elements).
  • Key implementation steps include defining current practices, developing factorial matrices, calculating statistical power, establishing engagement structures, analyzing results, and replicating findings.
  • A multicenter collaborative focused on reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections served as a case study.

Main Results:

  • OT enables the simultaneous examination of multiple practices within a care bundle.
  • This methodology helps identify which specific interventions or combinations thereof most effectively impact health outcomes.
  • The study provides a practical example of OT application in a real-world healthcare setting.

Conclusions:

  • Orchestrated Testing (OT) is a valuable methodology for improvement collaboratives to systematically evaluate care bundle components.
  • This approach allows for the efficient and quantitative assessment of interventions, leading to more targeted improvements in health outcomes.
  • Implementing OT can optimize the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives by identifying key drivers of success.