Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

A New Murine Model of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Published on: July 7, 2013
Long-term behavior of aortic intramural hematomas and penetrating ulcers
Alan S Chou1, Bulat A Ziganshin2, Paris Charilaou1
1Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Insights
Intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer present a higher risk of early rupture than typical dissection. Surgical management of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer improves long-term survival, unlike intramural hematoma.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are distinct aortic pathologies with debated long-term outcomes and optimal treatment strategies.
- These conditions, often grouped with aortic dissections, require careful evaluation for accurate prognosis and management planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term clinical behavior, radiologic progression, and survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with IMH or PAU.
- To compare the incidence of rupture and the need for late surgical intervention between IMH and PAU.
- To analyze the impact of initial treatment strategies (medical vs. surgical) on survival for both IMH and PAU.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 108 patients with IMH or PAU treated between 1995 and 2014 at Yale-New Haven Hospital.
- Data collection included medical records, radiology imaging, and mortality databases for radiologic follow-up and survival analysis.
- Patient demographics, presenting symptoms (including rupture state), and treatment modalities were analyzed.
Main Results:
- IMH and PAU showed a higher incidence of rupture-state symptoms on admission (18% and 32%, respectively) compared to type A (8%) or B (4%) aortic dissections.
- No cases of branch vascular occlusion were observed in the IMH group.
- Radiologic follow-up revealed worsening in 57% of IMH patients and 30% of PAU patients, often necessitating late surgery. Stable disease was noted in 55% of PAU patients.
- Overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 77%, 70%, 58%, and 33%, respectively.
- Patients with PAU initially treated surgically demonstrated significantly better long-term survival than those treated medically (P = .037), a difference not observed in the IMH group (P = .10).
Conclusions:
- IMH and PAU carry a substantial risk of early rupture, exceeding that of typical aortic dissections.
- IMH does not appear to cause branch artery occlusion.
- Patients with IMH and PAU rarely show spontaneous improvement on imaging, frequently requiring delayed surgical intervention.
- Initial surgical management for PAU is associated with improved long-term survival compared to medical management, whereas this distinction was not evident for IMH in this cohort.
Objective:
For intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, long-term behavior and treatment are controversial. This study evaluates the long-term behavior of intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, including radiologic follow-up and survival analysis.
Methods:
Between 1995 and 2014, 108 patients (mean age, 70.8 ± 10 years; 56% female) presented with intramural hematoma or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer to Yale-New Haven Hospital (New Haven, Conn). We reviewed the medical records, radiology, and online mortality databases.
Results:
Ten of 55 patients (18%) with intramural hematoma and 17 of 53 patients (32%) with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer had rupture state symptoms on admission, both greater than type A (8%) or type B dissection (4%) (P < .001). No branch vascular occlusion occurred. For patients with intramural hematoma with follow-up imaging, 8 of 14 (57%) worsened (mean follow-up, 9.4 months) and 6 (43%) underwent late surgery. For patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer with follow-up imaging, 6 of 20 (30%) worsened and underwent late surgery, and 11 (55%) showed no change (mean follow-up, 34.3 months). Overall survivals were 77%, 70%, 58%, and 33% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. No operative deaths occurred for patients with nonrupture state. Patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer with initial surgical treatment had better long-term survival than patients treated medically (P = .037). In the intramural hematoma group, no such difference was observed (P = .10).
Conclusions:
At presentation, the incidence of early rupture of intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer was higher than for typical dissection. For branch vessels, intramural hematoma never occludes branch arteries. On imaging follow-up, patients with intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer rarely improved, with late surgery commonly needed. Better survival was observed for the initial surgical management of patients with penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer compared with initial medical management.
More Related Videos
08:37Creation of a Rodent Model of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Blocking Adventitial Vasa Vasorum Perfusion
Published on: November 8, 2017
10:09Drug Treatment by Central Venous Catheter in a Mouse Model of Angiotensin II Induced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Monitoring by 3D Ultrasound
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management