Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed
Greg Ogrinc1, Louise Davies2, Daisy Goodman3
1Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH White River Junction VA, White River Junction, VT The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH Greg.ogrinc@va.gov.
The Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) 2.0 offers updated guidelines for reporting health care quality improvement studies. This framework enhances the systematic reporting of complex interventions to improve health care quality, safety, and value.
Area of Science:
- Health services research
- Quality improvement science
- Medical informatics
Background:
- The science of health care improvement has seen significant advancements.
- Existing reporting guidelines needed revision to reflect current practices.
- A need exists for standardized methods to report complex health care interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the development and key components of SQUIRE 2.0.
- To provide updated guidelines for reporting health care improvement studies.
- To establish a common framework for disseminating discoveries in scholarly literature.
Main Methods:
- Revision process conducted between 2012 and 2015.
- Incorporated feedback via interviews, focus groups, and an international steering group.
- Utilized consensus meetings and pilot testing with authors and public comment.
Main Results:
- SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes three core components: theory, context, and intervention.
- The guidelines accommodate the complexity and multidimensional nature of improvement work.
- The framework facilitates reporting across a wide range of improvement methodologies.
Conclusions:
- SQUIRE 2.0 provides a robust framework for reporting health care improvement research.
- It aims to standardize the scholarly reporting of quality, value, and safety initiatives.
- The guidelines offer common ground for sharing diverse improvement study findings.
More Related Videos
05:47Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
Published on: August 29, 2025
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Quality Assurance
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Standards of Care I
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...