Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.9K
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

317
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
317
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

44.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.1K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

415
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
415
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

507
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
507
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

338
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
338

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability Theory for Measurements with Variable Test Length, Illustrated with ERN and Pe Collected in the Flanker Task.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

Reliability Theory for Measurements with Variable Test Length, Illustrated with ERN and Pe Collected in the Flanker Task.

Psychometrika·2024
Same author

A Censored Mixture Model for Modeling Risk Taking.

Psychometrika·2022
Same author

Multivariate analysis reveals shared genetic architecture of brain morphology and human behavior.

Communications biology·2021
Same author

COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

The American psychologist·2020
Same author

Power struggles: when and why the benefits of power for individuals paradoxically harm groups.

Current opinion in psychology·2019
Same journal

The impact of impression management on writing tendencies: Investigating faking susceptibility of open-ended personality assessments.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Grateful leaders and attentive followers: How grateful attention transmits the cascade of gratitude expressions to strengthen coworker relationships.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Scoring employment interviews with large language models: Evaluation design components, validity investigations, and best practice recommendations.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A choice architecture intervention to increase diversity: Diverse defaults can counteract hiring discrimination.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Transformational leadership in context: A meta-analysis of 40 years of research.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

When does power disparity help or hurt group performance?

Murat Tarakci1, Lindred L Greer2, Patrick J F Groenen3

  • 1Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|November 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Group performance is better when power disparity dynamically aligns with competence. Static or misaligned power structures harm group effectiveness, challenging previous assumptions in power research.

More Related Videos

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Group Dynamics

Background:

  • Power differences are common in social settings, but their impact on group performance is debated.
  • Previous research has yielded conflicting results regarding whether high or low power disparity benefits groups.
  • Existing studies often rely on static hierarchy assumptions and overlook the alignment of power with competence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which power disparity influences group performance.
  • To challenge implicit assumptions in power research, such as static hierarchies and inherent competence of leaders.
  • To reconcile conflicting findings on power disparity and group performance.

Main Methods:

  • Agent-based simulation to model power dynamics and group performance.
  • Field study analyzing fraud investigation groups.
  • Multiround laboratory experiments to test theoretical predictions.

Main Results:

  • Power disparity benefits group performance when dynamically aligned with the power holder's task competence.
  • Constant or misaligned power disparity harms group performance.
  • Simulation and empirical findings support a dynamic model of power in groups.

Conclusions:

  • A dynamic understanding of power, contingent on competence alignment, is crucial for group performance.
  • Implicit assumptions in power research, like static hierarchies, can explain divergent findings.
  • Future research should consider the fluid nature of power and its relationship with task-specific competence.