Single-Layer Continuous Versus Double-Layer Continuous Suture in Colonic Anastomoses-a Randomized Multicentre Trial
F Herrle1, M K Diener2, S Freudenberg3
1Surgical Department of the University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Purpose:
Apart from stapling methods, single- or double-layer continuous hand sutures are established techniques for colonic anastomoses. It is unclear which hand suture technique has superior anastomotic safety. This randomized trial evaluated the incidence of postoperative complications depending on anastomosis technique.
Methods:
This multicentre randomized trial enrolled adult elective patients between February 2004 and June 2012 in four German university hospitals. Primary endpoint was incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage until 3 months postoperatively. Estimated sample size was 768 randomized patients. Main secondary endpoints were duration of anastomotic suture, postoperative morbidity and stool patterns at 3-month follow-up. Patients and postoperative outcome assessors were blinded to the group assignment. This trial is registered (NCT00996554).
Results:
Due to slow recruitment, the trial was stopped prematurely. Two hundred fifty-two patients (129 to single-layer suture anastomosis (SLA), 123 to double-layer suture anastomosis (DLA)) were randomized and analysed. Nine patients (3.6 %) were lost during follow-up. Exploratory primary endpoint analysis by intention-to-treat principle showed no significant difference for clinical anastomotic leakage between suturing techniques (SLA, 4 of 129 (3.1 %) vs. DLA, 6 of 123 (4.9 %), p = 0.532). Secondary endpoint analysis showed on average a 6-min shorter suture duration for SLA than DLA (18 min (4-49) vs. 24 min (8-50), p < 0.001). At 3-month follow-up, subjective well-being and stool patterns were not significantly different between groups.
Conclusions:
The present study did not reach sufficient power and cannot confirm whether both techniques might be equally or if one technique might be superior. Exploratory analysis suggests that in elective colonic resections, the single-layer continuous hand suture technique may be equally effective as the double-layer technique regarding incidence of anastomotic leakage, length of hospital stay, overall postoperative complications, subjective short-term well-being and stool patterns. Lessons learned from this trial course are summarized.
Trial Registration:
This trial is registered (Trial registration: NCT00996554). Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00996554 .
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Histology of the Large Intestine
The innermost mucosa layer comprises simple columnar epithelium, lamina propria, and muscularis mucosae. This layer is primarily populated with absorptive cells, tasked with water absorption, and goblet cells, responsible for secreting mucus to...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Anastomoses
Anastomoses can be formed at arterial, venous, and lymphatic vessels.
Arterial Anastomosis: These occur between arteries. They...


