Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

22.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.3K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

35.9K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.9K
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

38.5K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
38.5K
Population Growth00:57

Population Growth

29.5K
Population size is dynamic, increasing with birth rates and immigration, and decreasing with death rates and emigration. In ideal conditions with unlimited resources, populations can increase exponentially, which plots as a J-shaped growth rate curve of population size against time. This type of curve is characteristic of newly-introduced invasive species, or populations that have suffered catastrophic declines and are rebounding.
29.5K
Competition02:34

Competition

25.4K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
25.4K
Ecological Niches02:02

Ecological Niches

27.4K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
27.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Competition enables rapid adaptation to a warming range edge in a model plant community.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Behavioral shifts mask the success of legislation and outreach for endangered species recovery.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Rapid evolution predicts demographic recovery after extreme drought.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Joint test of historical vs. contemporary biogeography supports abundant center hypothesis shaping spatial patterns of self-fertilization.

Evolution letters·2026
Same author

Linking Climate and Demography to Predict Population Dynamics and Persistence Under Global Change.

Ecology letters·2025
Same author

An alpine plant shows no decrease in genetic diversity associated with rapid post-glacial range expansion.

American journal of botany·2025
Same journal

The emerging field of wild animal welfare science.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrating nutritional mutualists into the evolution of defense.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Formation of three great Asian plateaus, climate change, and biodiversity: (Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 970-982; 2025).

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Digital twins as a tool for ecosystem research.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Constraint and convergence in the evolution of vertebrate sound production.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Is a comprehensive root economics space a chimera?

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

8.1K

Where and When do Species Interactions Set Range Limits?

Allison M Louthan1, Daniel F Doak1, Amy L Angert2

  • 1Environmental Studies Program, 397 UCB University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0397, USA; Mpala Research Centre, PO Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|November 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Abiotic factors limit species ranges in stressful environments, while species interactions shape them in milder areas. This ecological theory needs broader testing to understand species distribution and climate change impacts.

More Related Videos

Characterizing Herbivore Resistance Mechanisms: Spittlebugs on Brachiaria spp. as an Example
06:52

Characterizing Herbivore Resistance Mechanisms: Spittlebugs on Brachiaria spp. as an Example

Published on: June 19, 2011

14.3K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

8.1K
Characterizing Herbivore Resistance Mechanisms: Spittlebugs on Brachiaria spp. as an Example
06:52

Characterizing Herbivore Resistance Mechanisms: Spittlebugs on Brachiaria spp. as an Example

Published on: June 19, 2011

14.3K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Biogeography
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • A foundational ecological theory, proposed by Darwin, posits that abiotic forces dictate species range limits in harsh environments (e.g., high latitudes/elevations).
  • Conversely, species interactions are theorized to determine range limits in more benign, less stressful habitats.
  • This widely cited theory, crucial for ecological and applied science, lacks clear definition and comprehensive empirical testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing evidence for Darwin's theory on abiotic and biotic influences on species range limits.
  • To analyze the conditions under which species interactions must vary across environmental stress gradients to support the theory's predictions.
  • To propose methodologies for more rigorous testing of this fundamental ecological concept.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies testing the theory of abiotic vs. biotic range limit determination.
  • Conceptual analysis of the relationship between environmental stress, species interactions, and range boundaries.
  • Synthesis of findings to identify gaps and propose future research directions.

Main Results:

  • The review indicates that while the theory is influential, empirical support is not uniformly robust.
  • Analysis reveals that the strength and type of species interactions must change predictably along environmental stress gradients for the theory to hold.
  • Current testing methodologies are often insufficient to fully validate the proposed pattern.

Conclusions:

  • The theory that abiotic factors dominate in stressful environments and biotic interactions in benign ones requires more rigorous, integrated testing.
  • Understanding these range-determining forces is critical for predicting species' responses to global climate change.
  • Future research should focus on multi-faceted approaches combining field, lab, and modeling techniques to test this ecological paradigm.