Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.5K
The Role of Uncertainty, Awareness, and Trust in Visual Analytics
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
|November 4, 2015
Summary
Visual analytics systems introduce uncertainties that can impair decision-making. Understanding these uncertainties and human biases is key to building trust and improving knowledge generation from complex data.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Information Science
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Visual analytics aids knowledge discovery from large datasets using various analytical and visualization techniques.
- These techniques can introduce uncertainties, compounding inherent data uncertainties and potentially affecting decision-making.
- User trust in visual analytics results hinges on their awareness of system-generated uncertainties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze uncertainties propagating through visual analytics systems.
- To investigate how human perceptual and cognitive biases influence uncertainty awareness and trust.
- To propose guidelines for designing uncertainty-aware visual analytics systems.
Main Methods:
- Unpacking uncertainties within visual analytics pipelines.
- Illustrating the impact of human biases on uncertainty perception and trust.
- Utilizing a knowledge generation model for framework and terminology.
- Comparing machine uncertainty with human trust measures using provenance examples.
Main Results:
- Propagated uncertainties can impair decision-making in visual analytics.
- Human biases significantly affect the awareness and interpretation of uncertainties.
- Trust in visual analytics is directly linked to the user's understanding of underlying uncertainties.
- Machine uncertainty and human trust measures, when compared with provenance, offer insights into system reliability.
Conclusions:
- Awareness of system-generated uncertainties is crucial for reliable knowledge generation.
- Designing uncertainty-aware systems can enhance user trust and decision-making.
- Addressing human cognitive biases in conjunction with system uncertainties is essential for effective visual analytics.
- Further research into provenance and trust metrics can lead to more robust and trustworthy analytical tools.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
1.9K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.9K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
12.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
113.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
113.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
55.8K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
2.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.2K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
10.4K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.4K

