Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2016
Are Child Cognitive Characteristics Strong Predictors of Responses to Intervention? A Meta-Analysis
Karla K Stuebing1, Amy E Barth2, Lisa H Trahan3
1Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 4811 Calhoun Rd, 4th Floor, Houston, TX 77204.
Insights
Cognitive skills in young children show a small association with reading intervention success. Baseline reading ability is a more significant predictor of reading intervention outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Early identification of children at risk for reading difficulties is crucial.
- Understanding predictors of reading intervention response can optimize educational strategies.
- Cognitive characteristics are often considered in assessing reading potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the association between baseline child cognitive characteristics and response to reading intervention.
- To determine the predictive utility of cognitive skills for reading intervention outcomes.
- To evaluate the practical significance of cognitive predictors in elementary school children.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was performed on 28 studies with 39 samples.
- Included at-risk elementary school children in third grade or below.
- Analyzed effects using three statistical models predicting reading growth, gain, and postintervention scores.
Main Results:
- Cognitive characteristics showed a small association with reading intervention response across models (mean r = .15 to .31).
- Effects were homogeneous within each model when aggregated by study.
- The predictive power of cognitive characteristics was limited when baseline reading ability was considered.
Conclusions:
- The association between baseline cognitive characteristics and reading intervention response is small.
- Using cognitive characteristics alone for prediction is of questionable practical significance compared to baseline reading.
- Future research should focus on more robust predictors for reading intervention success.
Abstract:
We conducted a meta-analysis of 28 studies comprising 39 samples to ask the question, "What is the magnitude of the association between various baseline child cognitive characteristics and response to reading intervention?" Studies were located via literature searches, contact with researchers in the field, and review of references from the National Reading Panel Report. Eligible participant populations included at-risk elementary school children enrolled in the third grade or below. Effects were analyzed using a shifting unit of analysis approach within three statistical models: cognitive characteristics predicting growth curve slope (Model 1, mean r = .31), gain (Model 2, mean r = .21), or postintervention reading controlling for preintervention reading (Model 3, mean r = .15). Effects were homogeneous within each model when effects were aggregated within study. The small size of the effects calls into question the practical significance and utility of using cognitive characteristics for prediction of response when baseline reading is available.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
The Nativist Approach
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence