Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Development of a Health Professions Education Research-Specific Institutional Review Board Template
Stephen D DeMeo1, Alisa Nagler, Mitchell T Heflin
1S.D. DeMeo is attending neonatologist, WakeMed Health & Hospitals, Raleigh, North Carolina, and adjunct professor of pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. A. Nagler is assistant director, Accreditation, Validation, and Credentialing, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois. M.T. Heflin is associate professor of medicine, Department of Medicine-Geriatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Problem:
Health professions education (HPE) has become a core component of the mission of academic health centers (AHCs) nationwide. The volume of HPE research projects being reviewed has increased, presenting new challenges for institutional review boards (IRBs). As HPE research becomes increasingly sophisticated in its design and methods, IRBs and researchers alike have a duty to better understand its unique characteristics. Researchers must be better able to conceptualize and describe their research to IRBs, and IRBs should be able to provide timely review and assure protection of research subjects (or participants).
Approach:
The creation of HPE research-specific IRB templates may be one way to improve the interactions between education researchers and IRBs. This report describes the development and early implementation of an HPE research-specific IRB template at Duke University from 2013 to 2014.
Outcomes:
Early adopters have noted increased ease of preparation and submission, while IRB staff have reported improved proposal clarity and more attention to protecting learners as research participants. Focus during educational or training sessions about the new template has shifted-from merely a description of the new submission process to a more comprehensive education series that includes discussion of regulatory definitions, examination of case studies, and opportunity for audience feedback.
Next Steps:
Continued collection of quantitative and qualitative data regarding the implementation of this IRB template will help its developers more precisely describe its effects on HPE research projects. Formalizing and streamlining the interactions between HPE researchers and IRBs is an important goal for all AHCs.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
09:16Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients