Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

13:31
High-resolution Quantification of Odor-guided Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster Using the Flywalk Paradigm
Published on: December 11, 2015
9.9K
Human sensory response to acetone/air mixtures
T Salthammer1, N Schulz2, R Stolte2
1Department of Material Analysis and Indoor Chemistry, Fraunhofer WKI, Braunschweig, Germany. tunga.salthammer@wki.fraunhofer.de.
Indoor Air
|November 6, 2015
Summary
Assessing indoor air quality involves evaluating chemical emissions and odors from building products. Standard ISO 16000-28 uses trained panelists to measure perceived odor intensity, but method uncertainties exist.
Area of Science:
- Indoor environmental quality
- Building science
- Sensory science
Background:
- Organic compound emissions from building products impact indoor air quality and odor perception.
- Standardized methods are crucial for assessing chemical emissions and odor acceptability of building materials.
- The ISO 16000-28 standard provides a procedure for odor evaluations in test chambers using trained sensory panels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the procedure for odor evaluations in test chambers according to ISO 16000-28.
- To highlight the role of trained panelists and a comparative intensity scale (Π-scale) in odor assessment.
- To identify sources of uncertainty in the odor evaluation method, particularly during panelist training and calibration.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing a panel of eight or more trained subjects to directly assess perceived odor intensity (Π) of air samples.
- Employing acetone/air mixtures within a defined concentration range (20-320 mg/m³) as a reference for panelist training and calibration.
- Conducting evaluations using diffusers within test chambers.
Main Results:
- The training and calibration procedure for panelists introduces significant method uncertainty.
- Key contributors to uncertainty include the assumed odor threshold of acetone and panelist response variability.
- Analytical determination of acetone concentrations and the physical characteristics of diffusers also influence results.
Conclusions:
- The described odor evaluation method, while standardized, is subject to considerable uncertainty.
- Addressing the variability in panelist responses and improving the accuracy of acetone concentration measurements are critical.
- Further research is needed to refine the calibration process and minimize uncertainties for reliable odor assessment of building products.

