Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants.

M R Rieger1, K Fareed, W K Adams

  • 1University of Texas Medical Center, Dental Branch, Houston.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|February 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-Port Percutaneous Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy Using the SP Robotic System: Initial Clinical Experience.

Urology·2020
Same author

Spontaneous diaphragmatic rupture following robotic prostatectomy.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2016
Same author

Experience with dental implant patients at Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital.

Saudi medical journal·2016
Same author

Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2009
Same author

Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate ceramic.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same author

Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging.

Journal of endodontics·1996
Same journal

Effects of prosthetic screw modifications and tightening conditions on mechanical outcomes in screw-retained implant restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Influence of silane-containing universal adhesives and separate silanization on lithium disilicate bond strength.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of the socket shield technique versus conventional postextraction implant placement: A systematic review.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Response to Letter to the Editor regarding, "Dimensional accuracy and clinical adaptation of monolithic zirconia crowns…" and "Effect of finish line designs on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns".

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Risk factors in peri-implantitis: A narrative review.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Vat photopolymerization-printed zirconia veneered with porcelain: Mechanical properties, fatigue properties, and fractographic analysis.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Finite element analysis of dental implant geometries reveals that a tapered design with a high elastic modulus minimizes stress concentrations. This finding is crucial for preventing bone resorption and ensuring implant success in dental implantology.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Endosseous dental implants are crucial for tooth replacement.
  • Understanding stress distribution in bone surrounding implants is vital for long-term success.
  • Implant geometry and material properties significantly influence stress patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the stress distribution patterns in cortical bone for different endosseous implant geometries.
  • To determine the influence of elastic modulus on stress concentrations.
  • To identify optimal implant design characteristics for dental implantology.

Main Methods:

  • Axisymmetric finite element models were created for three distinct implant geometries: serrated, screw-type, and finned.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ten different moduli of elasticity were applied to each geometry.
  • Von Mises stress contour plots were analyzed to assess stress distribution.

    • Main Results:

    • Serrated geometry caused high-stress concentrations at bony ingrowth tips and implant neck.
    • Non-tapered screw-type geometry showed stress concentrations at the base (high modulus) or neck (low modulus).
    • Low elastic moduli exacerbated stress concentrations in all geometries.

    Conclusions:

    • A tapered endosseous implant with a high elastic modulus is recommended for dental implantology.
    • Implant designs must avoid high-stress concentrations at the implant neck to prevent bone resorption.
    • Optimized geometry and material selection are key to successful dental implant integration.