Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Published on: June 12, 2015

Mixing in microfluidic devices and enhancement methods.

Kevin Ward¹, Z Hugh Fan²

¹Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-2023, USA.

Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering : Structures, Devices, and Systems

|November 10, 2015

Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Characterizing the composition and diversity of the vaginal microbiome in ovarian cancer.

Communications medicine·2026

Same author

Highly Efficient Capture of Sarcoma Cells in Microfluidic Devices.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026

Same author

Use of liposomal irinotecan with 5-FU and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) in neoadjuvant pancreatic adenocarcinoma: NEO-Nal-IRI trial.

The oncologist·2026

Same author

Development of a Platform for <i>in-situ</i> Airborne Virus Detection by Interfacing RT-LAMP Assay with a Condensational Growth Collector.

Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research·2026

Same author

Self-collected biospecimen consent and return rates in a population-based study among women with ovarian cancer: insights from the ORCHiD study.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2026

Same author

Assessment of a membrane filter coated with hygroscopic glycerol for improved recovery of airborne viable bacteriophage MS2.

Aerosol and air quality research·2026

Mixing in microfluidic devices is difficult due to laminar flow. This study reviews passive and active mixing strategies, discussing their pros and cons to guide method selection and potential hybrid approaches.

Area of Science:

Microfluidics
Fluid Dynamics
Chemical Engineering

Background:

Microfluidic devices face mixing challenges due to laminar flow at low Reynolds numbers.
This limits their application in various scientific and industrial fields.
Efficient mixing is crucial for reaction kinetics, analysis, and synthesis within microchannels.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a comprehensive overview of passive and active mixing enhancement techniques in microfluidics.
To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each mixing approach.
To offer guidance on selecting appropriate mixing methods for specific microfluidic applications.

Main Methods:

Review of passive mixing strategies (e.g., channel geometry modifications like ridges and slanted wells).

Keywords:

flow controls microfluidics micromixers mixing review

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding

Published on: April 10, 2012

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Analyzing Mixing Inhomogeneity in a Microfluidic Device by Microscale Schlieren Technique

Published on: June 12, 2015

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding

Published on: April 10, 2012

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Microfluidic Chips Controlled with Elastomeric Microvalve Arrays

Published on: October 1, 2007

Investigation of active mixing techniques (e.g., microstirrers, acoustic mixers, flow pulsation).

Discussion of integration challenges, control capabilities, and performance optimization through simulations and design variations.

Main Results:

Passive mixers offer simple integration but limited external control post-fabrication.
Active mixers provide better user control but require more complex integration and external components.
Both methods have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing mixing efficiency through various design modifications.

Conclusions:

The choice between passive and active mixers depends on specific application requirements, balancing integration ease with control needs.
Hybrid approaches combining elements of both passive and active mixing may offer synergistic benefits.
Further research into integrated passive-active systems could unlock enhanced performance and versatility in microfluidic mixing.