Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

A Large Animal Model for Acute Kidney Injury by Temporary Bilateral Renal Artery Occlusion
Published on: February 2, 2021
Can Acute Kidney Injury Be Considered a Clinical Quality Measure
1Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract:
Quality indicators are measurements of healthcare outcome, process, or structure that can be used as tools to measure the quality of care and identify opportunities for improvement. Acute kidney injury (AKI) has many characteristics that make it a potential target for quality indicator development. It is common, associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes, and there are reports of gaps in the quality of care in several clinical settings despite publication of evidence-based guidelines. Substantial work has already been undertaken to develop quality measures related to AKI following percutaneous coronary interventions and major surgical procedures. This paper reviews the current literature that has addressed issues of prevention or management of AKI as outcome, process, or structure quality indicators in these clinical settings. Several current controversies about the appropriateness of such indicators related to AKI are identified. Further research to strengthen the evidence-base supporting prevention and management initiatives for AKI across all relevant clinical settings is needed to clarify the role of AKI as a target for clinical quality indicators.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology

