Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity
Published on: August 21, 2015
A Food Transfer Program without a Formal Education Component Modifies Complementary Feeding Practices in Poor Rural
María J Ramírez-Luzuriaga1, Mishel Unar-Munguía1, Sonia Rodríguez-Ramírez1
1Health and Nutrition Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Mexican food baskets improved child nutrition more than cash transfers. Fortified foods in baskets significantly increased dietary diversity and iron consumption in children aged 6-23 months.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Nutrition
- Maternal and Child Health
- Nutritional Epidemiology
Background:
- Inadequate complementary feeding contributes to micronutrient deficiencies in young children.
- The Mexican government's Programa de Apoyo Alimentario (PAL) aimed to prevent malnutrition through food baskets or cash transfers, coupled with education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the PAL program on minimum dietary diversity and iron-rich/fortified food consumption in children aged 6-23 months.
- To compare the effectiveness of food baskets versus cash transfers, with and without educational components.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a randomized community trial with 3 intervention groups (food basket with education, food basket without education, cash transfer with education) and a control group.
- Difference-in-difference models were used to estimate the impact after 14 months of exposure in children aged 6-23 months at baseline and follow-up.
- Propensity score matching was employed to ensure comparability between treatment and control groups at baseline.
Main Results:
- The food basket without education intervention significantly increased consumption of iron-rich or iron-fortified foods by 31.2 percentage points (P < 0.01).
- This intervention also significantly increased the prevalence of minimum dietary diversity by 21.6 percentage points (P < 0.01) compared to the control.
- No significant impact was observed for the cash transfer or the food basket with education groups compared to the control.
Conclusions:
- Food baskets containing fortified complementary foods appear more effective than cash transfers for improving children's dietary quality.
- The educational component's impact could not be definitively determined due to differing results between the two food basket groups.
- Findings suggest targeted food interventions are crucial for addressing nutritional deficiencies in early childhood.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Microbial Nutrition
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...

