TD-DFT Benchmark on Inorganic Pt(II) and Ir(III) Complexes
Camille Latouche1, Dimitrios Skouteris1, Federico Palazzetti1
1Scuola Normale Superiore , Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|November 18, 2015
Summary
This study evaluates density functional theory (DFT) methods for calculating one-photon absorption spectra of platinum (Pt) and iridium (Ir) complexes. Hybrid functionals offer accurate results, while local functionals underestimate energies.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate prediction of electronic excitation energies is crucial for understanding and designing metal complexes.
- Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a powerful tool for computational chemistry, but the choice of functional and basis set can significantly impact results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively investigate and compare the performance of various Density Functional Theory (DFT) functionals and basis sets for calculating one-photon absorption spectra of platinum (Pt) and iridium (Ir) complexes.
- To identify reliable computational methods for predicting the optical properties of these transition metal complexes.
Main Methods:
- Employed time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations.
- Investigated 4 iridium and 7 platinum complexes.
- Compared nine different DFT functionals (GGA, global hybrids, range-separated hybrids) and two basis sets (LANL2DZ, def2-TZVP with pseudopotentials).
Main Results:
- Hybrid functionals (e.g., B3LYP, PBE0) provide comparable and accurate excitation energies, irrespective of the correlation functional.
- More recent functionals (CAM-B3LYP, M06-2X) tend to overestimate energies, while local functionals (BP86, M06-L) underestimate them.
- Basis set effects are minimal, with triple-ζ basis sets offering no significant improvement over double-ζ plus polarization but increasing computational cost.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid DFT functionals are recommended for accurate calculations of one-photon absorption spectra in Pt(II) and Ir(III) complexes.
- Computational efficiency should be considered when selecting basis sets, as simpler sets can yield adequate results.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
49.7K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
49.7K
Valence Bond Theory
11.7K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
11.7K
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
31.8K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
31.8K
Complexometric Titration: Ligands
2.6K
Different monodentate and polydentate ligands are used as complexing agents in complexometric titration reactions. The formation of complexes by mono- and bidentate ligands involves two or more intermediate steps, limiting their use as complexing agents. In comparison, polydentate ligands can form complexes with metal ions in a single-step process, facilitating sharper end points. This means polydentate ligands, such as amino carboxylic acid derivatives, are most commonly employed in...
2.6K
EDTA: Chemistry and Properties
3.9K
Polydentate ligands are most widely used in complexometric titrations because they form more stable complexes with the metal ions than mono- or bidentate ligands due to the chelate effect. Examples of polydentate ligands are ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), crown ethers, and cryptands. The most important feature of optimal polydentate ligands is the ability to form 1:1 complexes in a single-step process. Amino carboxylic acid derivatives are frequently used as complexing agents. EDTA is...
3.9K
Coordination Number and Geometry
19.8K
For transition metal complexes, the coordination number determines the geometry around the central metal ion. Table 1 compares coordination numbers to molecular geometry. The most common structures of the complexes in coordination compounds are octahedral, tetrahedral, and square planar.
19.8K


