(Dis)similarity Index To Compare Correlated Motions in Molecular Simulations

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are widely used to complement or guide experimental studies in the characterization of protein dynamics, thanks to improvements in force-field accuracy, along with in the software and hardware to sample the conformational landscape of proteins. Among the different applications of MD simulations, the study of correlated motions is largely employed for different purposes. Several metrics have been developed to describe correlated motions in the MD ensemble, such as methods based on Pearson Correlation or Mutual Information. Cross-correlation analysis of MD trajectories is indeed appealing not only to identify residues characterized by coupled fluctuations in protein structures but also since it can be used to extrapolate motions along directions in which major conformational changes should occur, for example on longer time scales than the ones that are actually simulated. Nevertheless, most of the MD studies employ average correlation maps and mostly in a qualitative way, even when different systems or different replicates of the same system are compared. The broad application of correlation metrics in the analysis of MD simulations, especially for comparative purposes, requires a step forward toward more quantitative and accurate comparisons. We thus here employed a simple but effective index, which is based on a normalized Frobenius norm of the differences between protein correlation maps, to compare correlated motions. We applied this index for a quantitative comparison of correlated motions from MD simulations of seven proteins of different size and fold. We also employed the index to assess the robustness of correlation description when multi-replicate MD simulations of a same system are used, and we compared our index to metrics for comparison of structural ensembles such as Root Mean Square Inner Product and the Bhattacharyya Coefficient.