Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

05:15
Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
7.7K
A randomized controlled experimental study comparing chitosan coated polypropylene mesh and Proceed™ mesh for
S T Jayanth1, Anna Pulimood2, Deepak Abraham3
1Department of General Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012)
|November 24, 2015
Summary
Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh demonstrated comparable efficacy to Proceed™ mesh in repairing abdominal wall defects in rabbits. This chitosan mesh shows potential as an anti-adhesive barrier for hernia repair.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Surgical Innovation
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Abdominal wall defects and hernias often require repair with synthetic or biological materials, facing challenges with adhesions and recurrence.
- Current mesh materials can lead to complications such as adhesions and re-herniation.
- Novel mesh coatings are being investigated to improve outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh against Proceed™ mesh (polypropylene-polydioxanone composite with oxidized cellulose coating) in a rabbit hernia model.
- To evaluate the anti-adhesive properties, tissue integration, and remodeling capacity of Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh.
- To assess the safety and effectiveness of these meshes in abdominal wall defect repair.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled experimental study involving twelve New Zealand white rabbits with surgically created ventral abdominal defects.
- Rabbits were divided into two groups, one receiving Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh and the other Proceed™ mesh for defect repair.
- Post-operative evaluation at four and twelve weeks included open exploration and histopathological examination to assess adhesion, tissue integration, and remodeling.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed between the Chitosan and Proceed™ groups regarding adhesion area, force to remove adhesions, tissue integration, or remodeling.
- Histological analysis indicated similar inflammatory responses, fibrosis, material degradation, and remodeling in both mesh groups.
- No instances of hernia recurrence, wound infection, or wound dehiscence were reported in any of the rabbits studied.
Conclusions:
- Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh exhibited similar efficacy to Proceed™ mesh in the repair of abdominal wall defects.
- Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh demonstrated potential as an effective anti-adhesive barrier in the context of incisional hernia and abdominal wall defect repair.
- The study suggests Chitosan coated polypropylene mesh is a viable alternative for hernia repair, offering comparable outcomes to existing composite meshes.

