Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of two interpolative background subtraction methods using phantom and clinical data.

A S Houston1, W F Sampson

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Naval Hospital, Haslar, Gosport, Hants, UK.

Nuclear Medicine Communications
|February 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

UK audit of single photon emission computed tomography reconstruction software using software generated phantoms.

Nuclear medicine communications·2002
Same author

UK audit and analysis of quantitative parameters obtained from gamma camera renography.

Nuclear medicine communications·2001
Same author

National survey of imaging technologists in nuclear medicine 1998/99.

Nuclear medicine communications·2001
Same author

UK audit of relative renal function measurement using DMSA scintigraphy.

Nuclear medicine communications·1999
Same author

An assessment of two methods for generating automatic regions of interest.

Nuclear medicine communications·1999
Same author

A control systems approach for the simulation of renal dynamic software phantoms for nuclear medicine.

Physics in medicine and biology·1999
Same journal

Diagnostic performance and quantitative characterization of PET/computed tomography in peritoneal deposits assessment.

Nuclear medicine communications·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic value of dual-time-point 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography in differentiating benign and malignant extrahepatic bile duct occupying lesions.

Nuclear medicine communications·2026
Same journal

Prognostic value of baseline 18F- fluroodexoygloucose PET/computed tomography-derived maximum standardized uptake value and tumor bulk in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.

Nuclear medicine communications·2026
Same journal

A comparative assessment of [99mTc] HYNIC-PSMA-11 scintigraphy in prostate cancer as a potential substitute for disease evaluation with [68Ga] PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging.

Nuclear medicine communications·2026
Same journal

Prediction of tumor radiation absorbed dose in radionuclide therapy based on the mean standardized uptake value from PET imaging.

Nuclear medicine communications·2026
Same journal

Serum cytokine profiles in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients with lung metastases: characteristics and the relationship with prognosis.

Nuclear medicine communications·2026
See all related articles

Two background subtraction methods in scintigraphy were evaluated. Cauchy integral subtraction is artifact-free but slower; bilinear interpolation is faster. Both are suitable for relative measurements but not absolute quantification.

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear medicine
  • Medical imaging analysis

Background:

  • Background subtraction is crucial for accurate scintigraphy quantification.
  • Interpolative methods are commonly employed but require careful validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of Cauchy integral subtraction and bilinear interpolation for background correction in scintigraphy.
  • To assess the suitability of these methods for both relative and absolute measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of two interpolative background subtraction techniques: Cauchy integral subtraction and bilinear interpolation.
  • Testing was performed using both phantom and clinical scintigraphy data.

Main Results:

  • Cauchy integral subtraction produced results relatively free of artifacts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bilinear interpolation was computationally faster than Cauchy integral subtraction.
  • Both methods demonstrated suitability for relative measurements like left ventricular ejection fraction and myocardial perfusion index.

    • Conclusions:

    • While both methods are viable for relative scintigraphy measurements, caution is advised for absolute quantification.
    • Avoid these interpolative methods for absolute measurements, such as glomerular filtration rate, if possible.