Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Recurrent Escherichia coli Urinary Tract Infection Triggered by Gardnerella vaginalis Bladder Exposure in Mice
Published on: December 4, 2020
Detection of ESBL- and AmpC-producing E. coli isolates from urinary tract infections
Sara Shayan1, Mohammad Bokaeian1
1Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Background:
Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC enzymes have been observed in virtually all species of the family Enterobacteriaceae. The β-lactamase producing bacteria cause many serious infections, including urinary tract infections. These enzymes are predominantly plasmid mediated. There are no recommended guidelines for detection of this resistance mechanism and there is a need to address this issue as much as the detection of ESBLs. This study was undertaken to characterize ESBL and AmpC producers among Escherichia coli by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which were initially screened by phenotypic method.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 90 isolates of E. coli were recovered from the urinary tract during a 7-month period, and were screened for ESBLs and AmpC production by disk diffusion test using cefoxitin (30 μg) disks and confirmed by combined disk diffusion test using phenyl boronic acid. The presence of genes encoding CIT, FOX, and TEM was detected by PCR.
Results:
On disk diffusion test, 59 of 90 isolates were resistant to third generation of cephalosporins; of these 37 (62.7%) and 3 (5%) were ESBL and AmpC producers, respectively. PCR showed that 29 (49.1%) and 3 (5%) were positive for blaT EM and bla CMY-2, respectively.
Conclusion:
ESBL- and AmpC-producing E. coli isolates cause significant resistance to cephalosporin. There is a need for a correct and reliable phenotypic test to identify AmpC β-lactamases and to discriminate between AmpC and ESBL producers. This work showed that boronic acid can differentiate ESBL enzymes from AmpC enzymes.
Insights
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli cause significant cephalosporin resistance in urinary tract infections. Phenyl boronic acid effectively differentiates these enzyme types, aiding in accurate detection.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Science
Background:
- Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC enzymes are prevalent in Enterobacteriaceae, leading to serious infections like urinary tract infections.
- These resistance mechanisms are often plasmid-mediated, and there's a lack of standardized guidelines for their detection.
- Characterizing ESBL and AmpC producers in *Escherichia coli* is crucial for effective treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize ESBL and AmpC producing *Escherichia coli* isolates from urinary tract infections.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of phenotypic methods, including disk diffusion and combined disk diffusion with phenyl boronic acid, for detecting these enzymes.
- To confirm the presence of specific resistance genes using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).
Main Methods:
- 90 *E. coli* isolates from urinary tract infections were screened for ESBL and AmpC production using disk diffusion tests.
- Combined disk diffusion with phenyl boronic acid was employed for confirmation and differentiation.
- PCR was used to detect genes encoding TEM, CIT, and FOX β-lactamases (blaTEM, blaCMY-2).
Main Results:
- 59 out of 90 isolates (65.6%) showed resistance to third-generation cephalosporins.
- Phenotypic screening identified 37 isolates (41.1%) as ESBL producers and 3 isolates (3.3%) as AmpC producers.
- PCR confirmed 29 isolates (32.2%) positive for blaTEM and 3 isolates (3.3%) for blaCMY-2.
Conclusions:
- ESBL- and AmpC-producing *E. coli* contribute significantly to cephalosporin resistance in urinary tract infections.
- Phenyl boronic acid demonstrates utility in differentiating ESBL enzymes from AmpC enzymes phenotypically.
- Accurate and reliable phenotypic tests are needed to distinguish between AmpC and ESBL producers for improved clinical management.
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Microbiota of the Urogenital Tract
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction
Bacterial Gastroenteritis
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology

