Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

130.5K
Overview
130.5K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

36.5K
36.5K
Protein Folding01:25

Protein Folding

12.5K
Proteins are chains of amino acids linked together by peptide bonds. Upon synthesis, a protein folds into a three-dimensional conformation, critical to its biological function. Interactions between its constituent amino acids guide protein folding, and hence the protein structure is primarily dependent on its amino acid sequence.
Protein Structure Is Critical to Its Biological Function
Proteins perform a wide range of biological functions such as catalyzing chemical reactions, providing...
12.5K
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER01:29

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

5.6K
ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...
5.6K
Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding03:00

Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding

20.8K
The native conformation of a protein is formed by interactions between the side chains of its constituent amino acids. When the amino acids cannot form these interactions, the protein cannot fold by itself and needs chaperones. Notably, chaperones do not relay any additional information required for the folding of polypeptides; the native conformation of a protein is determined solely by its amino acid sequence. Chaperones catalyze protein folding without being a part of the folded protein.
The...
20.8K
Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding03:00

Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding

15.5K
15.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temperature and developmental stage govern intestinal susceptibility to human coronavirus 229E.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Multiple molecular and cellular properties jointly affect protein and site-specific evolutionary rates.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Is the molecular microenvironment of the latent HIV reservoir predictable using deep learning approaches?

Journal of virology·2026
Same author

Identification of potential SARS-CoV-2 genomic regions representing hallmarks for adaptation to different hosts.

iMetaOmics·2026
Same author

Sign Epistasis Can be Absent in Multi-peaked Landscapes With Neutral Mutations.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

MPXV RNA-seq data provide evidence for protection of viral transcripts from APOBEC3 editing.

Journal of virology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Machine Learning: How Much Does It Tell about Protein Folding Rates?

Marc Corrales1,2,3, Pol Cuscó1,2,3, Dinara R Usmanova2,4,5

  • 1Genome Architecture, Gene Regulation, Stem Cells and Cancer Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain.

Plos One
|November 26, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models for predicting protein folding rates often show exaggerated accuracy. This study found lower predictive power on new data, highlighting common machine learning errors and suggesting learning curves to prevent them.

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding
12:42

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding

Published on: April 10, 2012

15.7K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K
Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding
12:42

Microfluidic Mixers for Studying Protein Folding

Published on: April 10, 2012

15.7K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

70.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Protein folding rate prediction is crucial for understanding protein folding principles.
  • Numerous computational models, including machine learning-based ones, have been developed.
  • Some models claim over 90% accuracy in predicting protein folding rates, but these claims may be inflated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the actual predictive power of published protein folding rate models.
  • To identify common machine learning misconceptions leading to overestimated accuracy.
  • To propose methods for more reliable model assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Tested three selected published machine learning models using new experimental data.
  • Analyzed model performance, focusing on predictive power and potential overfitting.
  • Investigated common violations of machine learning principles in model development.

Main Results:

  • Published models demonstrated significantly lower predictive power on new data than originally reported.
  • Overly optimistic accuracy claims stemmed from violations of fundamental machine learning practices.
  • Current experimental data is insufficient for robust linear predictors based on amino acid composition.

Conclusions:

  • Existing protein folding rate prediction models may be unreliable due to exaggerated claims.
  • Learning curves are recommended as a safeguard against common machine learning errors.
  • Further research with more data is needed for accurate protein folding rate prediction.