Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Endoscopic Endonasal Trans-sphenoidal Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
Published on: January 17, 2018
Assessment of pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses: a comprehensive and validated metric
Michael J Marino1, Jacqueline E Weinstein1, Charles A Riley1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a radiographic metric for characterizing the degree of paranasal sinus pneumatization. A validated metric for the extent of sinus pneumatization that comprehensively includes the maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, and sphenoid cavities is not currently available.
Methods:
A validation study was performed in which 5 independent reviewers evaluated 49 sinus computed tomography (CT) scans in coronal, sagittal, and axial orientations. Reviewers evaluated each scan, bilaterally, for 18 proposed dichotomous items as part of the Assessment of Pneumatization of the Paranasal Sinuses (APPS) metric. Evaluation of APPS items was independent of sinus opacification, which was simultaneously evaluated using the standard and validated Lund-Mackay scoring system. Interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed for each proposed APPS parameter and Lund-Mackay item using Fleiss kappa statistic.
Results:
Nine parameters were included in the final APPS metric due to substantial interrater reliability (κ(mean) = 0.61, κ(range) = 0.41-0.81) and intrarater consistency (κ(mean) = 0.64, κ(range) = 0.53-0.77), variable radiographic presence, and unique contribution to the characterization of sinus pneumatization. Kappa values were also calculated for Lund-Mackay interrater reliability (κ(mean) = 0.58, κ(range) = 0.45-0.66) and intrarater consistency (κ(mean) = 0.71, κ(range) = 0.65-0.75). The final APPS metric has comparable interrater and intrarater reliability to Lund-Mackay scoring. APPS scores were normally distributed within the study group by Anderson-Darling normality test (p < 0.005).
Conclusion:
The APPS score is the first comprehensive and validated metric for quantifying the degree of paranasal sinus pneumatization and anatomic variation. This has important potential utility in standardizing evaluation of sinus CT and researching the relationship of sinus pneumatization with clinical parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Anatomy of Respiratory System I: Upper Respiratory Tract
Nose and nasal cavity
The nose and nasal cavity represent the main external openings of the respiratory tract....
Nose and Nasal Cavity
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

